Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I noticed in my routes output in RHEL6 (and most 2.6.x series Linux), for every interface I see the creation of the following route in my kernel routing table:     U     1018   0        0 bond0     U     1019   0        0 bond1     U     1020   0        0 bond2

My understanding is that the link-local addresses are used when auto address configuration fails (when dhcp breaks). When dhcp fails the system will assign itself an available link-local address (more or less).

In your guy's experience, are these necessary? I'm utilizing manual/static IP assignment in my network, so there is no auto-address configuration. Therefore, there is no chance that auto-address configuration would fail. Can I safely remove these routes?

Or is there some other hack/reason I should keep these guys?


share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Link Local address space (RFC 3927) is a nice idea for client addressing, but in practice is rarely used for anything except catching an administrator's eye when reading ipconfig/ifconfig output to learn why someone's PC isn't on the network.

In fact, on my servers, I don't want link local addressing. I don't want servers to have a chance at being assigned a different address space. I don't even like link local address space on client PCs, but that's another post.

There is no kernel level wonkery going on with link local addressing that I am aware of. In fact, link local tables should simply be predefined in /etc/sysconfig/static-routes. Yank 'em, I say.

share|improve this answer
Thanks David, thats exactly what I needed to hear. I'll go ahead and remove these guys. In terms of the kernel level wonkery, here is an excerpt from the route command manpage: "Route manipulates the kernel's IP routing tables." I'm not sure about other distro's, but on RHEL5 & 6, /etc/sysconfig/static-routes does not exist. These link-local routes are created per "physical" interface on the system. I say physical, because these don't show up for vlan'd tagged interfaces, but they do on ethernet and bonds. – slugman Apr 27 '12 at 8:03

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.