Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've been doing some research about this topic but I had no luck finding my answer.

Will a 2Mbps G.SHDSL connection do the work or should I go with a 5/10/20Mbps Metro Ethernet connection?
Or am I in a completely wrong direction?
When I look for prices for a 5Mbps Metro Ethernet I get prices around $1500.

Thanks for helping me out here

share|improve this question

closed as not a real question by Ward, mdpc, ceejayoz, Zoredache, jscott Apr 27 '12 at 0:09

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

To get better results with your questions, I would specify more detail about what your webserver does, what sort of traffic you expect, etc. Currently the question seems to lack basic research as outlined in the FAQ. – Tim Apr 26 '12 at 20:06
You've provided no information on what kind of traffic your website has. A dial-up is probably sufficient if you're serving a single small static file to a visitor a day. A 20Mbps connection isn't sufficient if you're Twitter. – cjc Apr 26 '12 at 20:07
Well, it's more a facebook like social networking website. I know that hosting on a dedicated hosting is much cheaper but I really think that it'll grow fast and I don't want to be kicked out hence setting up my own datacenter. The web pages' average size are around 400 & 500 kb each. I only wanted to know if there was a web server specific connection because I read everywhere that the metro ethernet option is generally used for point-to-point connection for real-time conferences etc. I guess I have to go with a 100mbps at first. – Resul Alkan Apr 26 '12 at 20:43
I really can't see a reason why you would be kicked out of a datacenter for generating traffic. If they know how to bill their customers, they'll be glad to see high usage customers. Use a datacenter, it's what they're there for. By the time you get your own datacenter up with some redundancy and reserve generators, you'll have spent a lot more. – Sašo Apr 26 '12 at 20:46
Thanks for all the comments. I guess you're right. I'll look into the hosting companies for what the costs will be. – Resul Alkan Apr 26 '12 at 20:49

It really depends on what you'll be hosting. But regardless of that, for a general purpose web server, 10/10 would be the bare minimum nowadays.

I think you're looking in the wrong place. You should be looking into renting a VPS or a rack at a datacenter, where you'd get at least 100/100 connections to the main lines. It'll likely be cheaper in the end as well.

share|improve this answer
+1 everything else would be completely uneconomic for 1(!) server. – zaub3r3r Apr 26 '12 at 20:24
I disagree with the general hand-waving assumption of 10/10. We've got some quite functional websites running just fine on 2/2. They certainly don't serve large numbers of traffic, but they do serve about 500 mobile devices for 8 hours a day, each and every day. It all depends on what you're serving. – Mark Henderson Apr 26 '12 at 20:33

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.