Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

May be this question was already made, but I dont find an exact answer to my dilema.

I have a consulting IT job, my client have only 2 servers (16GB RAM, 2 Xeon 5160 and 500GB HDD) and him want to do a SQL Server R2 failover cluster, the Windows Server and sql server licences are not a problem, but I must do that with only 2 servers. There is no aditional servers besides one pfSense firewall and 2 MySQL servers, thats the reason I must do that with just 2 servers.

Additionally the two servers will have an ASP.NET application for internal use but must be failover two, I guest this can be done as a web farm too.

Can I do this setup? is there any tutorial?

Thanks for your help in advance.

share|improve this question
You don't appear to have a specific problem, other than wanting someone to tell you how to do your job. Yes, you can have a failover cluster with only two servers (you need shared storage). Google will give you plenty of info. – Chris McKeown Apr 27 '12 at 7:53

No you can't. You need external storage to build a cluster. Having two stand-alone servers is not enought.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.