Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm installing ubuntu on my server instance, and I have the following distributions to choose from:

  • Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid)
  • Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal)
  • Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot)

Which of these is the best choice for me to go with?


share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Zoredache, ewwhite, Ward, Stefan Lasiewski, devicenull May 1 '12 at 3:27

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Why not 12.04, the newest LTS? Anyway, you question is junk. How can we poosibly answer this in a useful way. You have told us nothing about what you are doing. – Zoredache Apr 30 '12 at 18:17
The service provider may not offer it yet, e.g., Linode. – cjc Apr 30 '12 at 18:20
Without knowing anything about your requirements this is a silly question to answer. Any of those three will result in a running operating system. An LTS release will be supported with updates for longer so go with that. – Martijn Heemels Apr 30 '12 at 19:03
up vote 1 down vote accepted

For a server, I would definitely go for ubuntu 10.4. This is a lts: long term support version. It will receive security updates for a longer period of time:


Apart from that it usually is more stable to start with, with a release date close to the debian stable releases.

share|improve this answer
In that case, why not go with 12.04, which is also a LTS release? The packages are much more up to date than 10.04. Unless you're worried about its newness of course, which is a valid point. Some people will decide to wait for 12.04.1, which is due in a few months. – Martijn Heemels Apr 30 '12 at 19:00
@Martijn: the question was which to choose from these 3. 12.04 would be a valid choice regarding support. Although I prefer an LTS which coincides with a freeze in debian. Debian is where most testing occurs, not in ubuntu.[as a matter of fact, this is the reason that I choose debian squeeze for servers, not ubuntu] – johanvdw Apr 30 '12 at 20:21
You're right, of course. I wasn't aware of the sync with Debian releases. You have a good point about that. Personally I prefer Ubuntu LTS releases since the packages in Debian are often too old for my needs, and I try to avoid backports. However if you want stable, that's where it's at. – Martijn Heemels May 1 '12 at 0:25

It really depends on what you're doing and what you're willing to put up with. Note that 10.04 (and, recently released 12.04) are Long Term Support versions, which will ensure updates will be available for a very long time. The 11.04 and 11.10 versions, not so much.

Basically, look at:

So, 11.04 will be de-supported later this year, and 11.10 early next year.

If you don't care about the long term life of your server, 11.x would be fine (though, as said, 12.04 just came out, and will have shiny new things available also). If you care about support, look at LTS versions. If 10.04 is all you can use, bug your service provider on when they can provide 12.04. If they can't provide 12.04 in a reasonable amount of time, and you want your support past the beginning of next year, use 10.04.

share|improve this answer

First you never should prefer a non-LTS, especially one which is not the most recent. So 11.04, should not even be a serious consideration. There is exceptions, as always, but when speaking generally the recommendation holds. This recommendation is only considering a server, a PC or workstation could use the regular releases.

I also would be hesitant to do an installation at this present moment, as the new LTS is already in BETA stage. 10.04, is not close to recent, although it does remain usable. If you are OK with running the older 10.04 software, with secuirty updates for 1.5 more years, it would suffice.

Truthfully I would get the most recent 12.04, and jump on early. It's not the safe bet, but who wants to consider a reinstallation in a couple months. However you might want to test it out, just to get a feel on how BETA it is currently.

share|improve this answer
I think Precise came out on Friday, actually. Not all service providers have images yet, though. OP should bug the service provider about when 12.04 images will be available, really. – cjc Apr 30 '12 at 18:26
This is true, but the OP did not specify if he was using a provider for his installation. Regardless I voted up your answer, as it was basically solid advice. – TechZilla Apr 30 '12 at 18:29
BTW it's already out!!, I'm starting my installations now thanks for the update!!!! – TechZilla Apr 30 '12 at 18:30

Ubuntu 12.04 must suit your needs if you are running the VPS to server websites. Ubuntu can utilise Nginx,varnish and all these tweaks.

Apart from this it is LTS and as many suggest, this version gets updates for a very long time.

I am a user of Linode and if you are on Linode, you already have the Option to rebuild with Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.

If you want the VPS for any applications or testing scripts, then make sure all the core components and sub components work and are supported on Ubuntu. Or else you can try something else like Cent OS or Archlinux.

Since no one here knows what you actually want, all we can do is suggest. It is upto you to make a choice and research on the available supported software on your project.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.