Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know it probably does not make sense, but can you reuse port-channel number on a LAN?

Examples

Switch 1 -----po1----- Switch 2 -----po2----- Switch 3 -----po1----- Switch 4

I would not do this, but this will help with an argument...

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Yes.

In fact - there is nothing wrong about it. Switch A might be using Port-Channel 1 to Switch B, and Port-Channel 2 to Switch C, while Switch B and switch C both use port-channel 1. It's quite normal, we do it here.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the feed back –  mrlayance May 29 '12 at 13:03

It's actually fairly common practice to keep channel group numbers consistent along a chain, but it's not necessary. The PC number is only significant to the switch - so you could have different port channel numbers on either side of a given connection (i.e. po1 on switch A connects to po2 on switch B), while these switches use otherwise overlapping numbers for other connections.

Consider the case of twenty access switches connecting to a pair of aggregation switches. For convenience's sake the access switches are identically configured such that po1 corresponds to aggregation switch A while po2 connects to aggregation switch B. On aggregation A a decision is made to number the port channels 101-120 (i.e. 100 + switch number). The same setup is used on the B switch. The aggregation switches have a crossover channel that is numbered po2 on both sides. Each also has a po1 that connects to a VPC trunk on a Nexus core switch (or MLAG on another vendor). Complete overlap of numbering in a fairly typical enterprise configuration.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.