Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm using NetApp device as a NAS storage. I have a lot of small files (30-60k) and dirs. For example I have: 30000 dirs with another 1000-2000 dirs.

A lot of dirs are empty, but most of them have many files (30k).

Should I change block size on Ext3?

share|improve this question
    
See serverfault.com/questions/6711/… and serverfault.com/questions/10698/… for possible duplicates. –  Richard Keller Jun 1 '12 at 10:41
add comment

2 Answers

If you're using the NetApp as a NAS, i.e. using NAS protocols such as NFS, CIFS/SMB, http etc. then you don't get to choose the filesystem, it uses NetApp's WAFL file system, you can't change it.

If you're using the NetApp to provide block-level sharing such as iSCSI/Fibre-Channel/FCoE then it's irrelevant that it's on a NetApp - you can assume it's on local disk for all intents. In which case please use our search function as this kind of question has been asked many times before.

share|improve this answer
    
This is right however regardless of access type the netapp is designed to use WAFL as the underlying filesystem. Netapp considers insulating block level access as a feature: partners.netapp.com/go/techontap/matl/sample/… –  Jim B Jun 1 '12 at 12:29
    
@JimB - yep totally with you there but if it's block at least you get to partition/format those LUNs as you wish, even though that actual block file is indeed on top of WAFL. –  Chopper3 Jun 1 '12 at 12:56
    
Yes, I'm using NetApp AS NAS. So I can't change file system. I have only 190 i-nodes free and 70% free space on volume. This is hudge problem. NetApp suggest to not increase free i-nodes over 40%. So I must create new volume? –  paszczak000 Jun 2 '12 at 21:17
2  
You can increase the max inodes for a volume using the maxfiles command -- you can increase but never decrease, so be careful. The default maxfiles value depends on the volume size, but it should generally be safe to increase by say 10% if you've never done it before. –  carillonator Jun 7 '12 at 23:02
add comment

Based on your requirements, I would recommend ReiserFS. Benchmarks show that ReiserFS performs optimally with a large number of small files compared to other file systems. Ext3 is far from optimal for your scenario, even with a smaller block size.

However, as has already been mentioned in one of the other answers, if you're using a NAS protocol you probably won't be able to choose the file system. If you're using it as a block device, take a look at the following extract from the Linux File System Primer:

EXT2

  • Recommended to move to EXT3
  • Not Journaled
  • POSIX access control

EXT3

  • Most popular Linux file system, limited scalability in size and number of files
  • Journaled
  • POSIX extended access control

JFS

  • High performance and scalability
  • Journaled
  • POSIX extended access controls

ReiserFS

  • Best performance and scalability when number of files is great and/or files are small
  • Journaled
  • POSIX extended access controls

XFS

  • Best for extremely large file systems, large files, and lots of files
  • Journaled (an asymmetric parallel cluster file system version is also available)
  • POSIX extended access controls
share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.