Would storing pages in S3 with only client-side code reduce costs in comparison to hosting them in Amazon's EC2?
Right now I use a cms to manage all of my pages and users for a website, but I was thinking about just saving the logged out state of my pages so that they would display as if there was not cms. To change the pages all I would have to do is save the files on my development server and push it to S3. My intuition says that this would be more economical than storing both the pages that need the client and server-side code, and the pages that just need the client-side code, but I have not tried this.
All pages on EC2.
EC2 Hosts: Client/Server side Pages
S3 Hosts: Client-side pages (Logged out state)