Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I plan on installing Debian 6 on my server build with a E3-1270, 16GB DDR3, and 2x120GB SATA3 SSDs. But this has me wondering, should I use Intel's built-in, on-board software RAID or the OSs'? Which will perform more efficiently? Which is simpler? Please give me a solid answer. Thanks!

share|improve this question
There's plenty of people with opinions of Intel's FakeRaid technology; they're pretty universally negative. See also… – Chris S Aug 20 '12 at 0:34
Also consider (Disclamer : I like the answers about software raid) – user130370 Aug 20 '12 at 0:42
If you use HW RAID: keep a spare HW RAID card handy in case it dies (or a support contract). It you use fake RAID, keep a spare motherboard handy (preferably with the same BIOS). If you use software RAID keep a spare OS ready (but that is easy, just reinstall and look in your documentation for RAID config). – Hennes Aug 20 '12 at 0:46
Maybe I'm the only person on the planet that's had a generally positive experience with Intel's fakeraid. Then again, I only use it on desktops and then only in RAID 1 mode. I'd never trust it on a server when there are much more flexible options available. If you can't afford a real hardware RAID on your server, at least go software instead of fake. – Charles Aug 20 '12 at 1:11

OS-based software RAID is more portable in the event of a hardware failure. Use that over motherboard-based fakeRAID. all things equal, use mdadm or ZFS over the motherboard.

share|improve this answer
I agree, the RAID provided by the OS have always been stable(my opinion) compared to the so called RAID found in motherboards. – Luis Ventura Aug 20 '12 at 6:15

Hardware RAID > Software RAID > fake RAID.

(Honestly, I prefer no RAID above fake RAID, but that's probably a matter of personal preference.)

share|improve this answer

They both work the same way. The only difference is who keeps the container information.

share|improve this answer
I don't agree. Software RAID has been known to actually work from time to tine. Seems like a difference worth noting. – HopelessN00b Aug 20 '12 at 1:04

I would suggest to find an Hardware RAID setup which is optimized for use with SSDs. AFAIK most SSD are RAID similar setups internal (connecting the modules in the frame and providing caching), which might perform slow on 'normal' (hardware or software) RAID controllers. Most (cheap) SSDs carry a JMicron controller, so perhaps you should focus on a decent hardware RAID controller for JMicron SSD devices, to improve life expectancy and read/write speed/caching on the RAID setup.

Unfortunately i've never reasearched this myself, but i know special SSD RAID setups exist..

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.