If a DNS server looks up a record and it's missing, it will often "negatively cache" the fact that this record is missing, and not try to look it up again for a while. I don't see anything in the RFC about the TTL on negative caching should be, so I'm guessing it's somewhat arbitrary. In the real world, how long do these negative records stick around for?
Tell me more
×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for
professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.
|
|
The TTL for negative caching is not arbitrary. It is taken from the SOA record at the top of the zone to which the requested record would have belonged, had it existed. For example:
The last value in the SOA record ("86400") is the amount of time clients are asked to cache negative results under If a client requests |
|||
|
|