Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Windows Server 2008 R2/IIS 7.5/Web Farm Framework 2.5

I am planning to deploy application across 4 web servers.

Should i use shared content/configuration using DFS among web servers for web farm scenario?

Second option is to use Web Farm Framework for deployment.

Furthermore, is there chance of single point of failure in WFF? for example what if primary server goes down.

which option would be better? pros and cons of each of the above.

I appreciate your response.

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The Web Farm Framework is easy. The only SPOF exists when integrating with an external load balancer as opposed to using the built in Application Request Routing. This is mainly because unless your load balancer is able to detect a failure on the server it may still try to route to that server.

If you are just deploying a single application the WFF is a perfect choice and MUCH easier to configure than the traditional shared config setup.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.