Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a couple of workstations (Windows Vista, 7) used to host virtual machines using Virtual Server 2005, Virtual PC 2007, or Virtual PC for Windows 7. If i want to sleep or hibernate the physical hosts, I tend to get paranoid and save the states of the virtual machines before doing so.

What I would like to know is there any adverse effects if I choose not to care and just immediately sleep the host?

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

I use XP Pro workstations and VMWare, and I suspend/hibernate the workstation regularly with no special attention paid to the VMs. The only adverse effect I've ever seen has been the workstations time getting further screwed up (For application reasons, I can't have them sync their time to anything).

share|improve this answer
Ditto. I've been doing this for years and I've never had any issues. – Mark Henderson Jul 21 '09 at 4:30
Me too. The time thing is a bit of a pain - VMware tools should sort it out - but the event doesn't always fire. You also might notice longer hibernate/resume times if your disks aren't fast... – Mike McClelland Jul 21 '09 at 19:26
Seemed fine after a night's period spent in Sleep. the only warning i see so far from W32Time complaining of time skip. I'll accept this for now, until i can observe what if sleeping during a VM's heavy/intensive activity with disk or network. – icelava Jul 22 '09 at 0:35

The standard answer in IT, it depends, applies here. Cursory searching shows people who had no problems, as well as people who had their guest VMs hang. My best bet is to try it and see; rollback is your friend here.

share|improve this answer

When I put my host PC to sleep with VMs active in VirtualBox, they're automatically paused before the host system goes to sleep. As a result, the guests recover from a sleep/wake cycle exactly as they do from being paused. (Occasionally I have trouble with the clock not updating, but this is likely an issue with the VirtualBox guest additions.)

A bit of experimentation will probably show if your VM software does the same.

share|improve this answer
Don't use VirtualBox so i'll have to test them out. – icelava Jul 21 '09 at 3:24

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.