Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm creating ONE Raidz2 Pool with 23 drives and a hot spare. (I know the hot spare isn't fully supported yet but thats fine)

Is it a bad idea to use this many disks in a single pool?

What would the consequences be if I did do this?

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Chris S Oct 12 '12 at 2:49

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Bad. Scrap it and use a distribution with a newer version of ZFS and features. NexentaStor is a good bet.

So why do I say it's bad? That pool layout goes against ZFS best practices. Please read here first.

For RAIDZ2, start at 6 disks and do not exceed 12 disks in each vdev...


try to have an even number of disks in the vdev if using raidz2...

Consequences include poor I/O performance (ZFS scales with the number of vdevs/groups of RAID disks), long rebuild times and the fact that mirrors will always outperform.

What are you planning to do with this storage setup?

share|improve this answer
nas4free also has a new version of zfs. – Matt Oct 11 '12 at 23:31
Just office file storage. Documents and such. – David Neudorfer Oct 15 '12 at 20:45

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.