Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Here's the go;

We have a server here at work, and its quite a powerful piece of kit. It would be better off being used as a workstation as we need the grunt. It is high-end consumer stuff so it would make this transition nicely.

All it is being used for is NFS and Active Directory in a Hyper-V VM. Hyper-V to me is very memory hungry considering we have an install of WS2008R2 to host it. As we have only 5-8 office employees accessing it at any one time, it seems quite overpowered.

So, I am suggesting we trim down our server to a smaller, quieter, less consuming HP Proliant Microserver which has the redundancy and grunt we need. It will only be running FreeNAS and possibly a slimmed down Ubuntu distro to host a Dropbox sync service 24/7. All this would be on top of the free vSphere single CPU.

Only thing is, it would be nice to retain the domain-based user rights in our windows installs to throttle local admin rights, and retain a central account system.

I had a look at OpenLDAP and couldnt find any obvious pathway. Is there anything that gives these features of AD without using AD?

share|improve this question

migrated from Oct 25 '12 at 11:46

This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power users.

up vote 1 down vote accepted

As far as I know, Windows clients cannot join anything other than a full Active Directory domain. (Central Kerberos authentication to a generic KDC is somewhat possible, but very tricky and requires local accounts anyway, since non-AD KDCs do not send the necessary account information (the PAC, if I remember correctly)).

Instead of Windows Server, however, you could test Samba 4, which can act as an AD domain controller. Although it's far from perfect, the latest release – 4.0 rc3 – should be stable enough for basic operation.

share|improve this answer
Hmm, just read into it. Sounds plausible. And it means I might be able to have an all-in-one implementation with FS, AD and DNS all within 12.04LTS. Even Dropbox could be installed with this. Would it be better to use FreeNAS in a separate VM simply because (at least in my experience) has better configuration through the UI? – Daniel Park Oct 25 '12 at 0:31

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.