Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

First of all I think this is a common problem, but cannot find a really good solution;

We have a web application, some of its request takes more than a minute. In the mean time we should be able to do more job with that application (for instance a simple lookup from database) but web server does not respond to any request until the previous one finishes.

As we are starting to develop this application from scratch we can embed everything including the option to change the web server also. Which web server or which methodology do you think we should follow ?

By the way we will use PHP for this.

Thank you very much, Baris

share|improve this question
2  
This seems more like an application design question which would be better suited to Stack Overflow or programmers.stackexchange.com rather that SF. –  Iain Nov 3 '12 at 19:20
    
It is more like a combination of both actually. Because maybe there is a solution transparent to programming language and we dont know, right ? –  Harun Baris Bulut Nov 3 '12 at 20:55
2  
There's something desperately wrong with your setup and the application, and this question in it's current form is not likely to be answered anywhere on SE. If it's a must to ask here, I'd start with splitting it into two: 1) Why it takes one minute (!) per request. 2) Why our server blocks until the request is processed. (1) May be ok for SF, (2) is probably better on SO. And provide 10 times more information than you did so far. –  Sandman4 Nov 3 '12 at 20:56
    
@Sandman4 You are most probably right about 2 but not about 1 because that specific request requires 3rd party application to respond. For 2; you may be right, we may be missing something but why I didnt give much information is I am looking for a solution without affecting your ideas. Also I am looking for an answer like; "You should use nginx because it lets you to open N threads at the same time" or maybe; "Use apache and enable module X to do this". –  Harun Baris Bulut Nov 3 '12 at 21:15
    
Oops - i should be vice versa (1) for SO, (2) for SF, of course. –  Sandman4 Nov 3 '12 at 21:20
add comment

closed as not a real question by Michael Hampton, mgorven, Scott Pack, rnxrx, sysadmin1138 Nov 4 '12 at 2:36

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1 Answer

You should use Apache because it lets you to open N threads at the same time.

(Or use Nginx because it serves multiple concurrent requests from it's single thread.)

share|improve this answer
    
haha, v. good :) While they're at it they should think about re-writing it in Lua –  Alastair McCormack Nov 3 '12 at 21:43
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.