Which behavior will take effect if both "soft-reconfiguration" is configured and route-refresh capability is negotiated ?
Tell me more
×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for
professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.
|
soft-reconfiguration will be used since, of course, doing the operation on locally stored routes is faster. If your peer supports route refresh (and most do), enabling soft-reconfig inbound is a waste of RAM and should be reserved for either when you have so much memory that you don't give a hoot, the peer is known to be slow to provide route-refresh updates or the bandwidth of the link is narrow enough that the BGP traffic is a concern to you. |
|||
|
|