Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it possible to use SATA drives when you have a SAS shared backplane to be able to address the drives?

share|improve this question
What type of server, hardware, controller and/or JBOD enclosure are you using? – ewwhite Nov 23 '12 at 14:52

Yes. It's definitely not ideal, but yes, you can.


  • Shared backplane behind a SAS expander. Not good.
  • Shared backplane with dedicated 4-lane SAS connectors (e.g. a Dell or HP server's internal drive bays with 1:1 port controller port to disk bay mapping). Okay.

I tell people to just use nearline SAS instead of SATA these days, just to avoid any issues. Expanders tend to cause more problems in these mixed scenarios.

Technical explanation in detail.

It's when you add SAS expanders (and SATA Tunneling Protocol) to the mix that you start encountering weird errors with misbehaving SATA disks. SATA simply isn't designed with a switching fabric in mind, and it looks like firmwares still aren't robust enough to deal with command tunneling reliably in the presence of errors.

share|improve this answer

SIMPLE answer: yes.

COMPLEX answer: Yes, IF the SATA drives actually behave correctly - some do not. Too few checks, so you get issues.

I run a 24 slow SA backplane full with SATA drives (SSD, Velociraptors) and I DID have a share of Problems under load. SSD Firmwareupdates got them under control.

isa blog post about a similar experience ;)

share|improve this answer

It's depend of SAS architecture. If your backplane have connector type SFF 8482 it is compatible. See:

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.