Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I want to access few (and not often used) Windows legacy applications over the network on (many) Linux clients.

I do not want to "share the desktop" (what VNC does), I want to start one application in one window (similar to what the X-Window system is capable).

Windows Terminal Server would do what I need, but AFAIK their CALs are over $100 per client, which is prohibitive and also does not fit our needs (we do not need constant permanent access, therefore

We are willing to pay a reasonable sum (a couple of thousand $ is OK) for a solution that works, but it must solve the problem and solve it forever (i.e. unlimited CALs, no recurring licensing costs, etc.).

Is there something like this available?

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by John Gardeniers, Ward, mdpc, Magellan, Wesley Dec 23 '12 at 6:01

Questions on Server Fault are expected to relate to server, networking, or related infrastructure administration within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Anything that does this how you want is almost certainly breaching MS licencing. Nobody pays TS cals because they want to! That said, a handful of concurrent licences shouldn't be too prohibitive but I'd definitely want a licensing expert involved. – Dan Dec 23 '12 at 0:07
I am voting to close this question as "Not a Real Question" because it is a shopping question. Shopping questions as disallowed on ServerFault for a variety of reasons, not the least of which a "correct" answer is subjective and will be outdated in a short period of time, thus reducing the value of the Q and A, and thus the site at large. – Wesley Dec 23 '12 at 6:01

This may give you some ideas;

Or if the legacy app don't have to be run over the network you could try getting them running in wine, once you have the apps working on one Linux client you can copy the wine setup to the other clients.

share|improve this answer

What Dan said is correct. Any answer that does not involve paying for CALs is against the license agreement you made with MS by purchasing their software. Windows does not have an equivalent framework to X for remote GUI applications, other than RDP/TS/RemoteApp. The cost of a CAL is per-user or per-device; you have a misunderstanding in that there is no recurring license cost as long as you're still running the same server. Also, one of your sentences doesn't end correctly, so I'm not sure you've presented what you think about the whole scenario. If you're a non-profit, MS software costs a lot less.

Costs of things need to be weighed against the value those things bring to your business.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.