Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm going to rent a server with 12 SATA disks hardware raid(planned to be configured as raid5), and I'm wondering what's the best practice where to put system partition in that case and the most efficient configuration. I'm going to use the server to serve static files, and the main reason for getting such a server is that I need lot's of space.

share|improve this question
    
Do you know the server make/model? How about the RAID controller? What OS are you using? –  ewwhite Jan 6 '13 at 15:17
4  
RAID 5? Do you hate your data that much? –  Michael Hampton Jan 7 '13 at 2:38
3  
Please read the RAID 5 section of this canonical answer. A 12-drive RAID 5 array is just asking for data loss with modern disk sizes: In a failure/rebuild scenario you have 12 chances for another drive to fail and completely destroy your array. Consider RAID 6 instead. –  voretaq7 Jan 7 '13 at 5:01
add comment

1 Answer

Totally impossible to answer. If that is going to be ONE raid 5 (which borders stupid if you ask me - I would at least make it raid 6, 12 discs it too many for a raid 5 in my eyes) then the only logical sense is "on all discs", as a separate first raid group. Otherwise you loose space (as the discs then have different free space). A Raid 10 or Raid 6 for the system is the only logical way to go.

Unless that is a pure file store, then the layout is disputable - if that is a database, I would split out some discs so I don't loose log and data at the same time.

I would say that is the nice time to put in a small SSD for the operating system. Many servers support that. But if not - well ;) A system partition, Raid 6 on all discs.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.