Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am going to make my website live on AWS servers and 100% of intended website audience will be from India only. As amazon offers you to get services from various zones, I was wondering is there any substantial difference in performance and page fetch time if I choose my server to be in North Virginia or in Asia Pacific?

I have read somewhere that more the server is near a client's computer, more fast the webpage loads on his machine. As number of hops between client's machine and server gets reduced.

If that is the case then Amazon offers three places in Asia Pacific(Singapore, Tokyo, Sidney) out of which Asia Pacific(Singapore) is the nearest place near India. Should I take server in Singapore only or I can choose any location?

Please suggest me?

share|improve this question
It should cost you only a few US cents to start a VM in each region and test it for yourself. – Michael Hampton Jan 13 '13 at 6:28
@MichaelHampton: Yeah, that could be the last option I have, but still I am looking for suggestions from people already having experience with such things. – Abhi Jan 13 '13 at 6:29
Any suggestions? – user21904 May 4 at 8:43
@user21904: Singapore region is best in terms of latency if your target audience is from India. I have run several test in past 3 years and eventual result is this. – Abhi May 4 at 9:11
up vote 10 down vote accepted

I am running a website whose traffic is totally from India only and tested various options.

If the traffic is from India only, just go for Singapore Zone in Asia Pacific region.

The latency from their is minimum and will vary somewhere around 70-120ms (measure from Delhi, India).

Though you would have to pay some extra bucks comparative to N. Virginia Region, but it's worth it.

The latency from N. Virginia region will be somewhere around 250-350 ms.

share|improve this answer
If we use Akamai (which has pretty decent edges in India) would be a good idea to host it at Virginia? Keeping in view the cost? – Ut xD Nov 21 '14 at 5:19
Well, if you are looking for cost, yes. But at the same time, it depends what service of akamai you are using and what type of content you have, like if you have lots of dynamic content, and you aren't using akamai dynamic caching, it won't help much. I believe you got my point. If you have dynamic content, and want to host site in N. Virginia, you should go for dynamic caching. For sure there will be some difference comparative to Singapore, but if your usage is high, your cost will be less. – GeekRide Nov 21 '14 at 10:10

The Amazon AWS availability zones are listed here. This list can be updated at any time, so this is a snapshot.

enter image description here

If you're serving traffic to India, it makes sense to place your systems in the Asia Pacific availability zone, if for no reason than latency. The path to Northern Virginia is far more complex, and you'd be bypassing the European Union region, which would be a better choice than anything in the United States.

share|improve this answer
Just an FYI: That's a map of AWS regions, not availability zones. Each region is composed of 2 - 5 availability zones. – jamieb Jan 14 '13 at 0:45

I dont know but if you hook up your site to a CDN that have nodes in India it will probably make the choice of AWS region even less important and make a real performance boost.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.