3

A couple of my users are having a problem where they will accept a meeting request, but the accept notice sent to the meeting coordinator says, "Accepted on behalf of X user by Y user." I have triple checked the settings for the permissions, and none of the people accepting on behalf of have access. (Not that they are actually doing the accepting anyways.)

We are currently using an Exchage2003 server with Office 2007. OS wise it's XP pro SP3.

6
  • Are they accepting with an iPhone? Jul 28, 2009 at 14:37
  • For now I am going to say no since most of them do not have iPhones.
    – user14714
    Jul 28, 2009 at 14:44
  • Ok. As an FYI, I've noticed that when I accept a meeting request on my iPhone it will accept from me on behalf of some other user. Jul 28, 2009 at 22:17
  • Ugh, it turns out that they do have iPhones. I knew one had an iphone, but apparently they both do. (Love how people share things with their help desk. :P) Thanks for help everyone. I greatly appreciate it!
    – user14714
    Jul 29, 2009 at 17:50
  • How are the meeting requests sent out? actual steps.
    – TheCleaner
    Feb 1, 2011 at 21:03

3 Answers 3

1

I don't suppose those two users are using any similar odd Outlook add-ins? I know that SP3 fixed some odd Outlook invite bugs, makes me wonder if a wire got crossed with previously written addins.

1
  • Unfortunately, neither are using any kind of plug-ins.
    – user14714
    Jul 28, 2009 at 18:00
0

Are the people accepting direct recipients of the original invite? This will happen if someone is forwarded a meeting request by someone who was directly invited.

2
  • They are direct recipients of the original invite.
    – user14714
    Jul 28, 2009 at 17:24
  • Ok, shoots that theory...
    – squillman
    Jul 28, 2009 at 17:45
0

check the delegate tab (tools --> options --> delegates). I have had users with the same problem and I removed anyone that showed as a delegate and that resolved the issue

1
  • None of the users have any delegates
    – user14714
    Jul 29, 2009 at 17:37

You must log in to answer this question.