Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm learning about dedicated servers and have a very simple question.

In windows server 2008, is it a good practice to fast format your HDs for the first time? Or should i perform a slow one?

Which are the differences mainly?

I've got 2 MBR and one GPT disks.

Thanks in advance.

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

This is answered by this answer:

Basically, quick format doesn't do a scan of the disk to check for bad sectors.

Here's a MS Article[1] on the topic.


share|improve this answer
I'll go for a slow one ^^. Thanks – SaintJob2.0 Jan 29 '13 at 20:54

If i remember correctly the main diffrence is as follows

a quick format, removes the MFT (Master file table) on NTFS partions, so basicly removes the information telling the disc where the data is stored.

a full format should write zeros to every sector.

I would imagine that discs from the factory (or new) should be pretty blank, so a quick format should suffice.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.