sometimes I want to send newsletters to my customers. The problem is, that some of the emails get caught as spam messages. Mostly by Outlook at the client (even in my own Outlook 2007).

Now I want to know what should be done to create "good" emails. I know about reverse lookup etc., but what about a unsubscribe link with an unique ID does that increase a spam rating?

Regards,
Uwe

link|improve this question

43% accept rate
From your name Uwe - I suppose you're German. Here is a nice article: absolit.de/spam.htm – splattne Jul 31 '09 at 7:51
feedback

4 Answers

up vote 24 down vote accepted

Be sure that your emails don't look like typical spam emails: don't insert only a large image, check if the character-set it the right one, don't insert "IP-address-only" links. Write your communication as you would write a normal email. Make it really easy to unsubscribe or opt-out. Otherwise, your users will unsubscribe by pressing the "spam" button, and that will affect your reputation.

On the technical side: if you can choose your SMTP server, be sure it is a "clean" SMTP server. IP addresses of spamming SMTP servers are often blacklisted by other providers. If you don't know your SMTP servers in advance, it's a good practice to provide configuration options in your application for controlling batch sizes and delay between batches. Some mail servers don't accept large sending batches or continuous activity.

Use email authentication methods, such as SPF, and Domain Keys to prove that your emails and your domain name belong together. The nice side-effect is you help in preventing that your email domain is spoofed. Also check your reverse DNS to make sure the IP address of your mail server points to the domain name that you use for sending mail.

Make sure that the reply-to address of your emails are a valid, existing addresses. Use the full, real name of the addressee in the To field, not just the email-address (e.g. "John Doe" <john.doe@example.com> ) and monitor your abuse accounts, such as abuse@example.com and postmaster@example.com.

link|improve this answer
feedback

Automatically unsubscribe recipients of your message whose e-mail addresses bounce, and establish complaint feedback loops with major mail providers and automatically unsubscribe recipients who report your message as spam/junk. This will go a long way to improving your reputation and deliverability.

link|improve this answer
1  
This is very interesting. I did not know anything about these feedback loops. Do all providers offer such a program? – Uwe Jul 31 '09 at 14:46
1  
Not all providers, no. But most of the major ones, including Yahoo and AOL and others. All of the complaint feedback loops I'm aware of require that messages are sent from a domain which is authenticated by DKIM or DomainKeys. I believe some also require SPF, but less commonly. – wg Jul 31 '09 at 14:53
feedback

Unfortunately there are many different filtering techniques and some major mail providers won't publish what they use and/or what weights are given to various tests/filters, so knowing how to get through is difficult. Basically spam has driven ISPs and users into a situation where they sometimes make it difficult for such legitimate messages (especially bulk messages such as your newsletter) to get through. I no longer consider email to be the half-way-reliable transport method it once was.

To be a little less negative and more helpful... As you are having specific problems with a particular client there may be things the program can tell you. I don't know specifically about outlook as I don't use it anywhere myself, but many mail filters inject headers into messages to list what filters were used, what the result was, and what the weighting given to that filter was. So if you look at the full source of the messages they did get moved to junk folders you may find useful clues. As an example, SpamAssassin based filters inject headers of the following form:

X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 13.371
X-Spam-Level: *************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=13.371 tagged_above=-10 required=5.4
    tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, FB_GET_MEDS=0.803, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619,
    RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_NONE=0.1, URIBL_AB_SURBL=1.86,
    URIBL_BLACK=1.955, URIBL_JP_SURBL=1.501]

(that example has been plucked from a genuine spam message in my junk pile)

This is not definite though as bayesian filtering and other methods that involve user training are common - so what your filters pass and fail may differ markedly to other people's even though the client was configured identically out-of-the-box. You might have to consider some other outlet for your news (many people are trying to use social networking protocols for this, with varying degrees of success).

link|improve this answer
feedback

Like others said, you want to avoid "looking" like a spam message when sending the email but you can't necessarily tell what will or won't make you look like spam because techniques vary.

One thing you might want to consider is sending a plain text email to your customers for each newsletter that actually contains a quick description/greeting followed by a "click here to view our latest newsletter!" message; that way you can host your message on a web server, you're reducing the size of emails (and load on your mail server) and as a bonus you can check the logs on your web server to get feedback on just how many customers are actually reading your messages vs. deleting them.

link|improve this answer
Hmm. I've never seen a spammer use that tactic before... – Ernie Jul 31 '09 at 16:22
Generally straight text with a legitimate link or two (not a lot sprinkled liberally) tends to get through...otherwise I can't email links to myself or other people without them getting flagged as spam. It's like saying that you've never seen spammers sent instant messaging with "dirty words" to entice people to respond. Legit traffic does it too. The key is not to be "too spammy"...a username like bevans is probably not as suspicious as "hottienakedchick69", even if the content is the same, you know what I mean? – Bart Silverstrim Jul 31 '09 at 18:33
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.