Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

We have some experience using Red Hat Satellite in an environment with ~120 servers. Now we're looking into deploying Ubuntu in parallel for the further growth.

How does Landscape compare to Satellite with regards to features and usability?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

I think one of the main differences is the fact that in Landscape you cannot have off-line install, with your own servers, you have always to be connected to the Landscape servers...

Also, Satellite went open source, called Spacewalk, i would kill for an opensourced Landscape...

Anyway, there's a project for supporting deb files on spacewalk, but I don't know what status does it have...

share|improve this answer
1  
Landscape does have an off-line install feature: canonical.com/enterprise-services/landscape/hosting-options –  Luke has no name Jun 3 '10 at 6:52
    
Finally! :D It didn't at the time of the question :P –  Andor Jun 22 '10 at 13:49

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.