Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top


I’m seeing a strange and extremely frustrating problem.

Any system that is not connect to the Internet (Windows 7 shows the no Internet access icon because it cannot constantly ping Microsoft’s servers) cannot even access locally hosted servers.


The problem appears to be that the HOSTS file is not being used to resolve DNS entries when there are no active NICs.

Tests / Reproduction

You can reproduce it as so:

  1. Disconnect a system from the Internet (make sure all wired and wireless connections are disconnected).

  2. If necessary, add an entry to the HOSTS file (e.g., foobar or

  3. Open a command-prompt

  4. Type ping foobar or ping


The screenshots below show a clear and demonstrative example. In the first snap, a laptop is connected to a router wirelessly. The HOSTS file has only three entries and they resolve just fine. In the second snap, the wireless radio is turned off, so the entries in the HOSTS file are ignored. Moreover, notice that pinging localhost still works even without any active NICs (as does, but it is using the IPv6 address (must be hard-coded).

You can see the same results in Windows XP with no IPv6 installed, so it has nothing to do with IPv6. I tried pining what should have resolved to while the desktop system (with no wireless NICs) was connected via its Ethernet adapter, then again after pulling the cable from the router and waiting a couple of seconds, then again after plugging the cable back in. The same thing happens if instead of pulling out the cable, the NIC is disabled through software (the [Disable] button in the NIC’s Status dialog or via Device Manager).


It looks as though the HOSTS file is only being read and used if there is an active NIC, otherwise it is being ignored. This makes some sense in that if there are no active network adapters, then presumably there will not be any network activity, and thus no need to resolve host names via the HOSTS file.

This assumption is specious however because it precludes locally hosted virtual servers. The HOSTS file should be used regardless of external DNS server connectivity, otherwise you cannot use simple/consistent/testing-production names for locally hosted servers when not connected to the Internet (for example web servers; help servers for Visual Studio, 3dsmax, etc.; and so on).


Does anyone know how to force Windows to use the HOSTS file even if there are no active NICs?


Figure 1: While the wireless NIC is connected to the router (the cable-modem is in standby, so no external Internet connectivity).


Figure 2: With the wireless radio turned off (the Ethernet port is not unconnected in both cases).

Not connected

Figure 3: Same results in XP with no IPv6

XP with no IPv6

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by MDMarra, mdpc, Jacob, dunxd, Scott Pack Mar 19 '13 at 17:04

Questions on Server Fault are expected to relate to server, networking, or related infrastructure administration within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Are there any proxies involved in your network or is your browser configured to use a proxy? – duenni Mar 18 '13 at 9:26
@duenni, No.​​​ – Synetech Mar 23 '13 at 16:42
I have re-written the question to clarify the underlying issue. It is NOT off-topic or localized, it appears to be an issue with Windows using the HOSTS file. – Synetech Mar 23 '13 at 16:42
It appears to be some weird bug in Win7. Here's a link, check if it works fo you – pupkinsen Mar 23 '13 at 18:15
@pupkinsen, hmm, I think it also happened in XP, but that link looks promising. It’s the weekend right now, but I’ll try it out first thing Monday. ☺ – Synetech Mar 24 '13 at 0:37

Did you try to check if these host names are resolved correctly with ping or something? That could help in locating the problem. If they are then it is most likely to be the problem that MDMarra described.

share|improve this answer
Actually I did. That’s how I figured out the underlying issue. I have rewritten the question to clarify the problem. – Synetech Mar 23 '13 at 16:43

Most likely you have a service or services binding to an address or interface that is no longer "up" when you've disconnected the cable. Check your config files.

share|improve this answer
I’m not sure what you mean. For example Apache binds to an IP address or hostname. If it’s binding to a hostname, shouldn’t the HOSTS file cause it to resolve to even if no external IP is found? If it is binding to (which is my case), then why would require an external connection? – Synetech Mar 16 '13 at 16:32
It has nothing to do with config files because the host name does not resolve at all. – Synetech Mar 23 '13 at 16:43

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.