Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a Windows 2012 server that is running SQL and therefore doesn't have any internet connectivity at all (only access to the domain network). I have it configured to receive updates via a WSUS server on our local network. I am getting numerous warnings in the event log for this server under the source of DeviceSetupManager with the following details:

  • A connection to the Windows Update service could not be established. (ID: 200)
  • The Network List Manager reports no connectivity to the internet. (ID: 202)

Can I simply disable the "Device Setup Manager" in services to prevent these warnings? I worry because in the description for this service it states "If this service is disabled, devices may be configured with outdated software, and may not work correctly". Has anyone else disabled this service and if so, did you encounter any issues? Or if I should keep this service enabled, is there some configuration I am missing for a computer not connected to the internet? FYI, normal Windows Updates on this server work as expected by checking our WSUS server.

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted
+50

Device Setup Manager just goes out and pings windows update every night to see if any devices that are installed and set up to use windows up date to update drivers.

Since this is an internal server there probably aren't too many devices attached to it who's drivers update frequently. It shouldn't matter too much to disable it, so long as you have the drivers up to date.

I would be a little concerned that it can't connect to WSUS, WSUS should bring down hardware updates too if you tell it to. Maybe if WSUS is a version previous to 2012 the DriverSetupManager service doesn't play nice.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the information (and sorry for the delay). One clarification, the system CAN connect to our WSUS server. It is a 2008 version though, so I'll see if that has any effect on it. –  bigmac Apr 3 '13 at 21:13

Disable automatic updates altogether.

share|improve this answer
    
And leave the server without critical patches and updates? I think his better of finding the root cause of the problem in this case. –  bonga86 Apr 2 '13 at 20:37
    
The server has no internet connectivity. That is the root cause. –  Eirik Toft Apr 2 '13 at 21:25
1  
@bonga86 You really shouldn't allow production servers to automatically update. You need to test the patches before rolling them out and systematically deploy them so you can have the servers imaged, data backed up, and stakeholders notified of an outage and in case of a failure. –  Snowburnt Apr 3 '13 at 14:51
    
Thanks Snow, maybe I didn't understand the question correctly. We definitely test before deployment, when you say 'shouldn't allow production servers to automatically update' do you mean all updates must be installed manually on servers? We have an OU with our test servers we first deploy updates too and test the update, when satisfied we approve it for our live systems. The install on the live systems is automatic as were already satisfied with the patch/update, so should this step be done manually? Thanks –  bonga86 Apr 6 '13 at 8:19

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.