Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have many small files (20 millions) with xattr on XFS drives. The average size of files is around 20KB and the average size of xattr is about 512 bytes.

Because I would like to move them to ext4, I tested to copy a part of these files into ext4 (with inode size 512 and 1024) and XFS drives.

I formatted 3 drives with the following options respectively:

# mkfs.ext4 -i 8192 -I 512 /dev/sde1
# mkfs.ext4 -i 8192 -I 1024 /dev/sdf1
# mkfs.xfs -f -i size=1024 /dev/sdg1

And copied about 30GB small files by cp -r --preserve=mode,ownership,timestamps,xattr

The result is as follows:

Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sde1            133654640  37164884  89360916  30% /srv/node/sde1 # ext4 -I 512
/dev/sdf1            124741744  36645652  80967252  32% /srv/node/sdf1 # ext4 -I 1024
/dev/sdg1            142507224  31020968 111486256  22% /srv/node/sdg1 # XFS

ext4 uses much more blocks than XFS in both cases. What makes these difference? How can I use ext4 not wasting disk space?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

One thing is that XFS doesn't perform well on millions of small sizes. XFS is not inode based FS. Your block sizes will differ as you have lots of small files, ext4 holds in data blocks group also indirect block maps, extent tree blocks, and extended attributes, inode lists e.t.c. which increase total block size for the same amount of files. Also journaling takes some. For ext4 you could remove journaling if you want, but recovery of fs time will increase significantly, also you could allocate less % for superuser using -m option (default is 5%) you could put up 1%.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.