Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

My setup is the following:

Synology Disk Station as iSCSI target
OS X 10.8 as client
Debian as client

I don't like to know that I should use WebDAV or similar file sharing protocols.

I'd like to access the same target from at least the both above named devices. What file system should I use? I guess it should be a cluster file system, but which one should I use for best compatibility?

share|improve this question
And why not WEBDAV or NFS ? They work well and is compatible with both platforms, without the weight of a clustered filesystem ? Why don't you be able to use NAS ? – Dom Aug 19 '13 at 7:19
Because WebDAV sucks? – Tom O'Connor Aug 19 '13 at 7:34

If you're going to simultaniously access the LUN from both debian and OS X you'll need a clustered filesystem like GFS.

This means that you'd have to cluster your OS X with the debian box, and that sounds to me like a really bad idea. I doubt if it's even doable.

Since your Synology Disk Station is a single point of failure already, clustering the file system will not save you from problems, but is likely to introduce them instead.

You'll save yourself a lot of headache by accessing the files through something like NFS.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.