Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm setting up a small LAN for my team. It will, for all intents and purposes, not be connected to any external networks. I would it to have centralized control of user accounts (at least, I think I'd like that; I'm also considering using puppet, so theoretically I could just push /etc/passwd changes, or something). The number of machines is fixed, but not very small. Mostly they're 'attached' to a single user, but sometimes people work remotely on someone else's box; and there are a couple of servers.

I've read this question, but my scenario is much simpler (even simpler than in this question) and I'd like to do something (relatively) quick, with not much hassle, but not a dirty totally-insecure hack. Is NIS relevant for my scenario? If not, what's the most hassle-free way to set up LDAP (or LDAP+Kerberos) to achieve the same?

Notes:

  • I have no experience with setting up either NIS or LDAP.
  • We use Debian-flavored Linux distributions, mainly Kubuntu 12.04 (not my choice, but that's the way it is).
share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

I don't think anybody uses NIS anymore - or at least, wants to.

The fastest and easiest way to get a nice LDAP+Kerberos environment up is FreeIPA. It's easy and light enough that I even use it at home.

Red Hat's Identity Management Guide is a great introduction to FreeIPA and will get you up and running quickly.

Note that while Ubuntu has FreeIPA, the version in 12.04 LTS is older and may have bugs or missing features compared to more recent versions.

share|improve this answer
    
From looking at the website, I'm worried it might be tied to RedHat'ish distributions (RHEL, CentOS, Fedora) distributions. Is this true? –  einpoklum Nov 1 '13 at 7:38
    
It's available for Debian and Ubuntu, but why would anybody be using those? :) –  Michael Hampton Nov 1 '13 at 7:42
1  
It does look better supported on RHEL/CentOS. When setting up something as critical as an identity management service, it might be advisable to use the best-supported distribution, regardless of what the client machines are using, IMHO. –  Mike Nov 1 '13 at 7:44
    
@Mike: The server's distro is not my choice, and I can't/don't want to use a dedicated server (or virtual server) for this. –  einpoklum Nov 1 '13 at 8:08
1  
Maybe if it were really one tiny daemon. You really do need to dedicate a (virtual) machine to this; if you can't or won't, then you shouldn't use FreeIPA. –  Michael Hampton Nov 1 '13 at 8:24

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.