Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've got a SQL 2000 installation on which I've enabled AWE to address additional memory. I'm in the process of migrating to SQL 2005 and the majority of the memory will now be needed for the 2005 instance. Can I leave 2000 with AWE set up, or should I disable it?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The proper thing to do would be to adjust the max server memory setting to a lower limit.

Also, Task manager will not show the correct amount of memory allocated to sql server. Use DBCC MEMORYSTATUS instead.

share|improve this answer

Seems not,

I've restarted the service and it's sitting on a pretty puny amount of memory.

share|improve this answer
Is the 2005 instance on the same box as the 2000 instance? How big are your databases? – SuperCoolMoss Aug 22 '09 at 12:39

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.