Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a VM which I've created on a host using the following settings:

It has been up and running smoothly for months but recently the VM lost connection with the outside world. When this happened the following was logged in /var/log/messages:

23:54:14.260088+02:00 foobar kernel: [11347792.392529] e1000 0000:00:03.0 eth0: Reset adapter

After that the following is logged every 8 minutes:

INFO: task kworker/0:2:15934 blocked for more than 480 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
kworker/0:2     D ffff88029fc132c0     0 15934      2 0x00000000
 ffff8800d3373d20 0000000000000046 ffff8800d3370740 ffff8800d3373fd8
 ffff8800d3373fd8 ffff8800d3373fd8 ffff8801175560c0 ffff8800d3370740
 ffff88029fc132c0 ffff8800d3372000 ffff8800d3370740 00000000ffffffff
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81596bf2>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x22/0x30
 [<ffffffff815957dd>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xdd/0x170
 [<ffffffff815951fa>] mutex_lock+0x1a/0x40
 [<ffffffffa00f3f0e>] e1000_watchdog+0x7e/0x560 [e1000]
 [<ffffffff810616ab>] process_one_work+0x12b/0x4d0
 [<ffffffff81062f1d>] worker_thread+0x15d/0x460
 [<ffffffff810681c3>] kthread+0xb3/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8159eafc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0

The VM was not reachable from the outside world (even to ping) and I had to restart it from the host. All other services though where still running.

The only other cases of a eth0: Reset adapter log during all those months happened on the 3 last days in random hours. In all those 3 cases the network was not interupted because it seems that the "Reset adapter" happened successfully:

2014-01-23T14:08:57.951062+02:00 foobar kernel: [11053476.083094] e1000 0000:00:03.0 eth0: Reset adapter
2014-01-23T14:08:58.042241+02:00 foobar kernel: [11053476.174267] e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX
2014-01-25T19:03:46.588071+02:00 foobar kernel: [11243964.720101] e1000 0000:00:03.0 eth0: Reset adapter
2014-01-25T19:03:46.658094+02:00 foobar kernel: [11243964.790501] e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX
2014-01-26T16:33:43.312085+02:00 foobar kernel: [11321361.444181] e1000 0000:00:03.0 eth0: Reset adapter
2014-01-26T16:33:43.504585+02:00 foobar kernel: [11321361.636903] e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX

Just before those 3 successful resets I got a watchdog warning:

Some more info about the system:

# lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440FX - 82441FX PMC [Natoma] (rev 02)
00:01.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II]
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH VirtualBox Graphics Adapter
00:03.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 02)
00:04.0 System peripheral: InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH VirtualBox Guest Service
00:07.0 Bridge: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 08)
00:0d.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 82801HM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) SATA Controller [AHCI mode] (rev 02)

# ethtool -i eth0
driver: e1000
version: 7.3.21-k8-NAPI
bus-info: 0000:00:03.0
supports-statistics: yes
supports-test: yes
supports-eeprom-access: yes
supports-register-dump: yes
supports-priv-flags: no

I cannot find anything else in the logs that relate to this issue. Any idea why this has happened or where should I look at next?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Michael Hampton Feb 28 '15 at 13:39

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions should demonstrate reasonable business information technology management practices. Questions that relate to unsupported hardware or software platforms or unmaintained environments may not be suitable for Server Fault - see the help center." – Michael Hampton
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Had a similar problem after upgrading to 4.3.22 this morning. Quick fix was to shut down my VM's and change the network adapter types to something that wasn't Intel.

Been running a couple of hours now with no issues.

share|improve this answer
Changing from Intel to another adapter worked for me too – Ben Ziegler Feb 22 '15 at 16:47

protected by Community Feb 28 '15 at 13:39

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.