# Low-budget, value-for-money, NAS unit with NFS support [closed]

I'm looking to buy a NAS unit for file storage on my network. It doesn't need to be massively fast, but high stability for a low price point is the ideal.

I have a maximum budget of about AUD$1000, including the disks. I can get 1TB disks for about AUD$100 each, though if the disks can included with the machine, all the better. Also, as is obvious by the pricing, being available in Australia is also a good idea.

I need the system to hold at least two disks, and be RAID capable (Probably RAID 1 for two disks, or RAID 5 for more). The storage capacity needs to be at least 500GB per disk, preferably 1TB. It also needs to be NFS capable, because that's how the machine will be accessed from the rest of the network.

We've tried building setting up our own NFS machines before, and they've always fallen over. So we're going with an all-in-one box this time.

Does anyone have any recommendations for machines that would fit my requirements?

-

## closed as too localized by Mark Henderson♦Jan 14 '12 at 3:47

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Please expand on what you mean when you say 'fallen over', are you referring to hardware failures, or what? What component of the systems are failing? –  Zoredache Aug 25 '09 at 21:37
According to the techy (I'm really not), the NFS shares keep going stale... –  Margaret Aug 25 '09 at 23:07
@Margaret, an iSCSI solution with a cluster file system like OCFS2 is preferrable –  HTTP500 Aug 26 '09 at 2:00

if your stale NFS handle problems are the same as the ones i've been having intermittently over the last few months, then there was a patch to fix that by Cristoph Hellwig released about two weeks ago. it's not yet in 2.6.30.5 but it should be in 2.6.30.6 (it's already in the 2.6.31 release candidate).

if you (or your sysadmin) is comfortable with patching and compiling the kernel, there IS a patch available for 2.6.30.5. i have applied it and recompiled and it works.

from what i've read, the problem was introduced around 2.6.29.x, and it is specific to sharing XFS file systems over NFS. the bug is actually in the XFS code rather than the NFS code.

you can identify the problem by searching your kernel log for lines like:

"reconnect_path: npd != pd"

(oddly enough, i never got this problem on my home network where i use NFS for very high bandwidth recording, playing, and transcoding of MythTV shows....but i got it quite often at work where NFS is used fairly lightly to export virtual host directories from the file server to the webservers. both running similar kernel versions and with XFS as the filesystem)

-

You could buy an average beige box and stock it with a number of drives and install OpenFiler or FreeNAS, set them up to do software RAID, and that way you'd save by not spending for hardware RAID and could still get a decent network card for it. OS is free, administrate it with a web interface, and since it's off-the-shelf you can easily maintain it.

Just make sure you have a good backup solution in place since; RAID isn't a backup.

-
The problem with this is, as I said, we've been going the 'beige box' route previously, and they always seem to fall over. I don't know whether we don't fully understand the system or what, but we've had major stability issues with the last couple we've had. –  Margaret Aug 25 '09 at 21:27