up vote -2 down vote favorite
share [g+] share [fb]

Possible Duplicate:
Why are Linux-based operating systems considered safer than Windows?

Better for security /Hardware friendly /no need to shutdown for yr/ and which take lot of load in trumps of hit /easy admin /less patch work?

link|improve this question
2  
Ok, this looks like a loaded question from every possible angle. – Manuel Ferreria Aug 29 '09 at 20:13
pls help me with this i need to give small class on this to one of the school i have got same doc on the same but if community help in this subject it will good for me. – Rajat Aug 29 '09 at 20:29
There is no "safe" operating system! The only reason why Linux has been relatively safe was simply because it wasn't big enough as a target. The same with OS X. Sure, some hackers hack for fun but there are plenty of criminals out there who will go after the bigger targets where there's money. In general, that means Windows, since Windoes tends to be mostly used in commercial ways. – Wim ten Brink Aug 30 '09 at 1:59
feedback

closed as exact duplicate by mrdenny♦ Aug 29 '09 at 20:37

This question covers exactly the same ground as earlier questions on this topic; its answers may be merged with another identical question. See the FAQ for guidance on how to improve it.

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote

OpenBSD, maybe.

link|improve this answer
if can write little more about ur these techie part will that help me lot thanks a ton – Rajat Aug 29 '09 at 20:31
feedback

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.