Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm specifying a Windows server to run Oracle for (time based) performance tests of our application.

Although the total data volume & number of users will be low, we would like the performance to be comparable to a high-powered server which is hosting many users & much more data; in other words the type of machine a large enterprise client would have.

My questions are: - is this realistic, can we get comparable performance? - if so, any things to look out for in the server specification?

Many thanks

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by sysadmin1138 Jan 5 '12 at 3:21

Questions on Server Fault are expected to relate to professional server, networking, or related infrastructure administration within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
Fast disks, running RAID 10. Lots of RAM. Reasonable CPU. Those are first prize. –  user3914 Sep 11 '09 at 12:04
    
Product and service recommendations are specifically off topic for ServerFault (see point 4 in the NOT About section of the FAQ) –  sysadmin1138 Jan 5 '12 at 3:21

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I've just setup some HP DL380 G6 servers for a departmental level Oracle database.

8 cores, i7, 12+ GB of RAM. 8 15k rpm disks in a 2u rack mount.

We got ours for about $AUD 15,000

Not sure what your budget is though... ideas vary about what is 'enterprise' level.

share|improve this answer

I would aim for the enterprise level hardware, then something like Swingbench / Hammerora to generate accurate data volumes and load levels. If the application is well designed, it should scale. If it is poorly designed, it may work wonderfully for small data/user levels then fail miserably when trying to scale up.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.