up vote 3 down vote favorite
share [g+] share [fb]

Please reply I need to prove something to my boss.

link|improve this question
Okay keep the answers coming... – leeand00 Oct 14 '09 at 19:13
Okay my bad. To be fair, they were running Red Hat 7.2. Also they upgraded the rest of the systems to Apache2.2 and didn't upgrade mine (which is still running Apache 1.3 on Red Hat 7.2) But still! They're running Apache 2.2 on Windows on the new servers. – leeand00 Oct 14 '09 at 21:38
feedback

migrated from superuser.com Oct 14 '09 at 18:02

This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power users.

23 Answers

Apache 2; mostly Linux (Fedora), but some Windows server installs as well.

link|improve this answer
feedback

Apache 2.2; Mac OS 10.5

link|improve this answer
feedback

Apache 2.2.x/CentOS 5.3 in one location , 2.2.x/RHEL 5 in another.

link|improve this answer
feedback

Apache 2.2.3

Debian 4.1

What, exactly, are you trying to prove?

link|improve this answer
@Alcon I'm trying to prove to my boss that he should really upgrade from Apache 1.3.27 because I need to use php as a proxy to call a web-service that doesn't support JSONP. Of course this would probably mean he'd need to upgrade from Red Hat 1.3 so I'm not so sure this is going to work. – leeand00 Oct 14 '09 at 18:24
He has other servers that are Windows based and run Apache 1.3.27 and this isn't much better. – leeand00 Oct 14 '09 at 18:25
1  
YIKES! Well, good luck. – Daniel Bingham Oct 14 '09 at 18:36
"Red Hat 1.3" lol wut? – Joseph Kern Oct 14 '09 at 18:38
Lol indeed. I thought the same thing. What's he running it on, a pentium II? – Satanicpuppy Oct 14 '09 at 18:45
show 5 more comments
feedback

Apache 2.2.3, on CentOS 5.x/RHEL 5.x

link|improve this answer
feedback

Apache 2; on debian and CentOS

link|improve this answer
feedback

apache 2 on windows server 2008

link|improve this answer
feedback

Apache/2.2.13 (FreeBSD) :)

link|improve this answer
feedback

Apache 2.2.3 on Fedora core 9

If for no other reason, you are probably in need of better security patch support.

Risk mitigation can be a powerful ally when talking to managers.

(provided your project is important enough not to just shut down)

link|improve this answer
There is only one project. This is a place that survived the first and second dot-com bubbles for no good reason but dumb luck. – leeand00 Oct 14 '09 at 20:03
feedback

Apache 2.2.3 on Centos 5.3

link|improve this answer
feedback

Apache 2.2/Linux 2.6.30 (Gentoo)

link|improve this answer
feedback

apache 2.2.3 Ubuntu 7.04

link|improve this answer
feedback

Apache 2.2.14 on Gentoo Linux.

FWIW, the API interface in Apache 2.0 and greater is significantly better/faster/simpler/less dumb. PHP performance increased nearly 15% on the same hardware/OS by using 2.0.x vs 1.3.x.

link|improve this answer
feedback
  • Linux, Apache/2.2.9 (Debian)
  • Windows 2000, Apache/2.2.?
link|improve this answer
feedback

I still have few Apache 1.3.x and 1.4.x - running on some versions on Fedora (yes, i know!), but mostly:

Apache 2.2.x on CentOS 5.3 platform.

link|improve this answer
feedback

2.2.3 on CentOS

link|improve this answer
feedback

Apache/2.2.9 (Debian)

link|improve this answer
feedback

Apache 2 (Ubuntu)

link|improve this answer
feedback

2.2.3 Suse Linux Enterprise Server 10

link|improve this answer
feedback

Apache 2.2.8; Ubuntu 8.04.2

link|improve this answer
feedback

centos 4.6 apache2

link|improve this answer
feedback

The Apache 1.3 derived version which ships with OpenBSD. Here's a snippet from their FAQ page:

Why isn't a newer version of Apache included? The license on newer versions is unacceptable.

link|improve this answer
feedback
~$ apache2 -v
Server version: Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu)
Server built:   Aug 18 2009 14:18:10
link|improve this answer
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.