Take the 2-minute tour ×
Server Fault is a question and answer site for professional system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a network running 100 users with pc and 20 SIP phones. I also have 3 servers runnign an extranet on a 100GB leased line.

My primary device is a ZyWall 35 and I have decided that this device is a bottle neck and a limit to performance.

What device should I look at as an upgrade? I have no idea where to start and already bored of slick salesmen who know nothing.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by TheCleaner, Falcon Momot, mdpc, Ward, Tom O'Connor Aug 30 '13 at 7:13

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they tend to become obsolete quickly. Instead, describe your situation and the specific problem you're trying to solve." – TheCleaner, Falcon Momot, mdpc, Ward, Tom O'Connor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
100GB leased line? Is that a typo of 100Mb/s? Or is that total bandwidth/month? –  Cian Oct 15 '09 at 11:10
add comment

4 Answers

Aside from the obvious: you can build a linux/bsd router box that can do this for next to nothing. I've heard great things about the netscreen 25's but they stopped selling them:

The NetScreen-25 is end of sale, and in its place, we recommend the SSG140, the SSG320M, or the SSG350M, high-performance security appliances that offer LAN/WAN connectivity for regional and branch office deployments.

I've had good luck with Netscreen's in the past, though the Jun-os stuff is hella different if your used to ciso and work in the CLI a lot. Their web gui is pretty slick though.

share|improve this answer
1  
The netscreens use ScreenOS, not Jun OS. –  Cian Oct 15 '09 at 11:11
    
+1, I really like the Netscreen/SSG and they work well with QoS for VOIP. I don't now if the SSG140 will support a full 100m connection though (maybe 75). –  Doug Luxem Oct 15 '09 at 13:38
    
I've had good experience with the J-series routers, which is idential hardware to the newer netscreens but running JUNOS rather than ScreenOS. JUNOS is easier to use than ScreenOS in my experience, but I've only used ScreenOS on a small ADSL router. Highly recommend Juniper kit. –  David Pashley Oct 15 '09 at 13:54
add comment

I've had a lot of good experiences with pfSense which is a BSD based distribution. It has been very stable with uptimes of >9months before reboot for infrastructure maintenance.

I've tended to use it where I've had multiple networks and needed to setup complex NAT/routing between them obviously with firewalls and logging.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 for pfSense. Great project. –  EEAA Oct 15 '09 at 13:27
add comment

If you like your Zywall.. the next model up? Alternatively, look at SmoothWall - be aware that I am biased, I work for SmoothWall, but not in the capacity of "know nothing sales droid" so you're safe ;)

share|improve this answer
    
I liked the community edition of smoothie. (and I'm not a sales droid) –  Joseph Kern Oct 15 '09 at 12:56
    
Joseph: You may be interested to hear that SmoothWall Express (aka community edition, aka smoothie GPL) is going to be seeing an alpha of version 4 soon... lots of new fun stuff there :) –  Tom Newton Oct 15 '09 at 13:29
add comment

For that size of company I can recommend Watchguard Firewalls.

I have very good experience with those boxes, they are very easy
to setup and working without major glitches. Also their support and
customer care is very great.

Take a look at the Firebox® X Core™ e-Series on their site.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.