When an employee is fired or let go, it is critical to disable their accounts and access to resources immediately. How do you handle this at your organization?
feedback
|
|
First: Make it your process to tell I/T before you tell the employee that they have been terminated. Have them taken out before they know they're fired. Second: Keep careful, detailed records of all systems that the user has access to, and remove them in order of priority. Make sure the people in I/T understand whose responsibility it is to remove each piece of access. Third: In the event of an "off the cuff" firing, detail someone to keep an eye on the employee until I/T finishes removing their privileges. | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
HR should coordinate with IT before the employee is actually terminated. This way, IT can remove access before the action takes place. This is important because it prevents the employee from deleting or removing data that they either a) didn't want the company to see or b) wanted to delete to harm the company (via time loss, research loss, record loss, etc) in some way. It is also important to have IT not remove any data, for similar reasons as with b). Companies often need to go back and retrieve the data of prior employees for legal reasons in addition to business continuity reasons. IT should only grant access to this data to people approved by HR. | |||||
feedback
|
|
Assuming you aren't firing them for fraud or anything. Before you start a policy of putting black bags over their head, and dragging them kicking and screaming from the building - consider what future interaction you are going to have with them. | |||||
feedback
|
|
You simply implement the pre-arranged procedure. i.e. the most important thing is that you've already got a plan and not just scrabbling around doing what comes to mind at the time. If you have months to think about and develop a plan it'll be so much better than if you think about it off the cuff. Oh and for what it's worth I'd say worry more about physical things (keys, building access, user storage, copies of media) than locking out electronically - most malicious data loss comes in these ways than via purely electronic ways. | |||||||
feedback
|
As a side note, it's a much more lengthy and immediate issue if it's an I.T. person that you have to let go, given the amount of admin access they may have to everything. | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
This is more of a procedural question than a technical one. Basically, you need to have a provisioning process and a de-provisioning process. People tend to forget about de-provisioning. That process might be as simple as "call so and so and create accounts" or may involve opening help desk tickets or may be done by an enterprise application. That isn't really relevant -- what is relevant is that you need to handle this stuff consistently and have a pre-arranged plan. We have a few user identity stores and a delegated admin model. Essentially, a designated rep in each business unit can access the provisioning system and setup user accounts. A ticket is opened with IT support to assign/deassign PCs, and a ticket with another organization takes care of ID/building/parking access cards. What happens to data depends on the organization. Places that get sued often tend to purge first, ask questions later. Other places vary widely. I've worked in some places that purged everything, other places that kept critical data in the home directory of an engineer who left 5 years earlier. I think the best practice is to "impound" the PC and home directory data for a few weeks, then delete everything unless there is a good reason not to. | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
Every system needs a system owner who's responsible for this. They could delegate tasks like this to that system's administrator but it's the owners task to initiate change hence the owner should know if to prioritize access removal and so on. Depending on the size, the CSO or whatever the english title for the information security officer is should coordinate and/or request specific routines to follow when this happens. Have a manual routine/policy to begin with if the ownerships aren't clear enough and then start automating the parts that seem costly or generally problematic. Going the whole way there are identity life-cycle systems to look for as well to help in managing this. | ||||
|
feedback
|