Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I plan to run eight applications on an eight core machine and expect all applications to utilise 100% cpu, will the OS "get enough time" for its own tasks or should I instead run seven applications on the machine and leave one core for the OS, so to speak?

The applications will not do any disk i/o to speak of, but a lot of network i/o.

share|improve this question

The kernel will apply different priorities to specific processes. You can see this by running "top" and checking the "nice" column.

The time critical OS processes will therefore have a higher priority. Therefore, the OS will run these processes before your specific applications. This will make sure that these processes happen at the right moment.

This mechanism makes a core reservation pretty much useless.

share|improve this answer
+1, "useless" is the perfect term. – womble Nov 16 '09 at 9:35
Yes, process priority will probably solve most things, but I guess it will also introduce "unnecessary" context switching for the application processes, right? Running all "OS processes" on one core maybe minimises this? In my original question I was also thinking more of "kernel internals" (interrupts, kernel threads, etc.) rather than processes. – Henrik Nov 16 '09 at 11:47
These are legitimate questions indeed. I usually decide that the kernel is smarter then me and I leave things as is. – Antoine Benkemoun Nov 16 '09 at 13:00

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.