Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Has anyone set up NFS where both the server and the clients are all Windows? I am wondering:

  • How Does Performance Compare to using builtin Windows file sharing (CIFS/SMB)?
  • Can clients mount NFS shares as network drives just like with regular file sharing?
  • Any recommended tools since Windows does not support this natively?
  • Does doing this provide reliable file sharing?
share|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

CIFS/SMB really should be your choice for Windows clients & servers - NFS can be very insecure without the hassle of Kerberos. Using SMB you get the standard Windows security model.

  • Performance wise there is not not much much in it - possibly SMB is a bit faster.
  • XP needs Windows Services for UNIX (here) to mount NFS
  • Windows Server can only mount NFS shares not offer them. It has to use SMB.
  • Reliability for an XP client mounting an NFS share from a Linux server so far has been fine, although we only have a couple of machines doing this.

In conclusion for a Windows server, NFS is not an option. For an XP client only use NFS if you have to - due to only having a Linux server when you don't want the hassle of setting up SAMBA

share|improve this answer
NFS is much lighter and much faster than SMB. This is the old question though but at that time NFS were faster anyways. – bakytn Jan 30 '12 at 16:30

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.