Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it possible to 'mount', for ignorance of a better term, a cloud service like as Cloud Files or S3 to a linux / ubuntu server?

Ideally I'd like to be able to browse the remote location as if it were a local directory.

How is this done, if possible?

share|improve this question

How about s3fs? Performance is going to be pretty bad, but I know it's used with satisfaction by many people.

share|improve this answer
Performance really isn't that bad in the newer versions :) – ben lemasurier Aug 30 '11 at 17:57

The Rackspace version of s3fs mentioned above is 'cloudfuse' and can be found here:

In both cases the solution is similar - a FUSE based connection.

share|improve this answer

Judging from this discussion: and should do what you ask (never tried it).

share|improve this answer
Yup, you can use RS Cloud Files storage (or S3) as backing for a JungleDisk setup. – phoebus Dec 31 '09 at 22:00

S3QL provides a full featured UNIX filesystem for Amazon S3 buckets and even arbitrary SFTP servers.

They have a comparison page where they list the features compared to those of other filesystems for S3 like S3FS and S3Backer.

I've been using S3FS on an Ubuntu machine for a while but it doesn't support UNIX permissions. S3QL handles permissions and also offers encryption and compression. I highly recommend it.

share|improve this answer

The problem with cloudfuse is that it doesn't support full Unix filesystem semantics (you can't set the date/time stamp on files/objects once they're uploaded, and iirc you can't set user/group permissions), and it doesn't support things like symlinks or hard links. It also fully caches everything to be written to the local disk before it uploads anything, and it doesn't do chunking for the content to be uploaded.

All that makes it pretty tough to use as an remote filesystem alternative.

S3ql would be a lot closer to a proper remote filesystem alternative, if I could get confirmation that it does actually support using Rackspace Cloud Files as a backend, either directly or indirectly through a compatibility layer.

share|improve this answer

I'm using Yandex.Disk It offers WebDAV access. You can mount it like a local folder via webdavfs. At this moment (june 2014) tariffs include 10G for free forever, 1T for 9000 rubles (nearly 260 USD) per year and more. VISA and MasterCard payments accepted. Speed is good from Russia and CIS.

share|improve this answer

protected by Michael Hampton Jun 15 '14 at 11:57

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.