meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 4 months |
| seen | 9 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 120 |
|
May 15 |
revised |
Exim rejecting a specific e-mail address prefix added 1350 characters in body |
|
May 15 |
comment |
Exim rejecting a specific e-mail address prefix That's a long story, see my answer :-) |
|
May 15 |
comment |
Exim rejecting a specific e-mail address prefix Accepting spam and quarantining is bad practice for the most part, but I digress. Search the exim configuration and I am pretty sure you will find the culprit. You may also want to check files exim reads from other locations (such as /etc/aliases) |
|
May 14 |
answered | Exim rejecting a specific e-mail address prefix |
|
May 14 |
suggested | suggested edit on Exim rejecting a specific e-mail address prefix |
|
May 8 |
comment |
Load Balance Mail Gateways +1 I wasn't aware of this solution, good information. That may work, but it adds additional complexity and failure modes. Whereas MX records and DNS is rather simple and effective and "just works". I think it would be overkill unless your site gets so much email traffic that just using MX records and DNS and having multiple MTAs of equal priority is just not going to work. |
|
May 8 |
comment |
Load Balance Mail Gateways MTAs are very capable handling a large throughput and MX records provide a helpful cheap way to balance load and create redundancy. I think you'll find that if you focus more on the backside of things (improved i/o speed for queue handling for example) things can improve greatly. Big sites have implemented their own email load balancing and there may be a few commercial offerings available, but I doubt the cost is warranted unless you have a load like one of those big sites. Besides any slapped together solution will likely prove to be more of a pain than an actual solution. |
|
May 8 |
revised |
connection times out after 1GB download added 191 characters in body |
|
May 8 |
answered | connection times out after 1GB download |
|
May 8 |
revised |
Load Balance Mail Gateways added 494 characters in body |
|
May 7 |
revised |
Load Balance Mail Gateways added 594 characters in body |
|
May 7 |
answered | Load Balance Mail Gateways |
|
May 6 |
comment |
sda1 (?) raid failed on debian - what to do now? Sure if this is a server with critical data go ahead and replace it. Though it's useful to try and bring the disk back to life until you got a replacement. But if the server is lowly QA machine or dev test box that's being abused anyways I see little point replacing a disk unless it is really broken. |
|
May 4 |
revised |
How do I get `mount` in ESXi 5.0? edited tags |
|
May 2 |
comment |
How to test if DNS information has propagated? +1 agreed.. :-) |
|
May 2 |
revised |
mount using insecure ports for nfs added 256 characters in body |
|
May 2 |
comment |
mount using insecure ports for nfs I see, i was suspecting you meant <1024. I think that the behaviour you try to prevent is just basic functionality. However see my updated answer. |
|
May 2 |
answered | mount using insecure ports for nfs |
|
May 1 |
awarded | Analytical |
|
May 1 |
revised |
Monitor LSI 3ware raid controller on ESXi added 2 characters in body |
