network profile
| bio | website | cinaird.se |
|---|---|---|
| location | Sweden | |
| age | 28 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 3 months |
| seen | Mar 6 '12 at 20:12 | |
| stats | profile views | 1 |
Happy
|
Feb 7 |
comment |
Robocopy falsely marks files as newer @LarrySilverman I formatted the disc as NTFS and then mounted it, so if Boxee Box dose'nt formated it the, it should be NTFS, else i don't know |
|
Feb 6 |
comment |
Robocopy falsely marks files as newer @LarrySilverman Ok, no I did a test I should have done much earlier. I tried a different destination. Same computer as the source, but different hard drive. It worked like a charm, so now I know the problem is my destination. The destination is a Boxee box, so I don’t have so much control. Thaks for all the help. I tested what you suggested, but there was no difference on the files timestamp, and sadly just /XO did not do the trick. I will try some new settings on the box and hopefully it will work. |
|
Feb 4 |
revised |
Robocopy falsely marks files as newer eddit, no diff found |
|
Feb 4 |
comment |
Robocopy falsely marks files as newer @LarrySilverman ok, now i have done a fc and a compare, and both say no differences |
|
Feb 4 |
comment |
Robocopy falsely marks files as newer @LarrySilverman, Actually I’m not sure how to be absolutely sure, but I think the files are untouched what I can see in Procmon, maybe it’s on the receiving end. The option to only copy files if the size had changed would be perfect, but sadly I haven’t found it either. I think my best option is to test with some other synchronization software. Thanks for all the help. |
|
Feb 2 |
comment |
Robocopy falsely marks files as newer @LarrySilverman I’m pretty new to this, so bear with me if I don’t do things right. I run the backup script twice after each other and look in the Process Monitor it doesn’t show any *.mtl files ass accessed, but shouldn’t it show at least twice? And the Modified date Is still 2008-04-07. I think I have missed something. |
|
Feb 2 |
revised |
Robocopy falsely marks files as newer Added output |
|
Feb 2 |
comment |
Robocopy falsely marks files as newer @LarrySilverman Good observation but no, they are in the same building, and the only reason I have /FAT /DST /XO is to overcome the “Newer” bug, but obviously it does not work. I have tried with, without and all the combination of them. |
|
Feb 2 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
|
Jan 30 |
comment |
Robocopy falsely marks files as newer @TrevorSullivan: No, it is randomly distributed among my most common filetypes in the folder. Here is a sample of the most common filetypes: mtl, obj, jpg, png, pdf, pdf, odt, html, txt, psd, rar |
|
Jan 30 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Jan 30 |
revised |
Robocopy falsely marks files as newer Minor changes |
|
Jan 29 |
comment |
Robocopy falsely marks files as newer Yes, it is, not all files is marked "newer" about 20% maybe |
|
Jan 29 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jan 29 |
asked | Robocopy falsely marks files as newer |
