network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | 10022 | |
| age | 29 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 2 months |
| seen | 10 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 4 |
|
May 14 |
awarded | Enthusiast |
|
May 7 |
awarded | Tumbleweed |
|
Apr 30 |
asked | Apache/mod_expires adding caching headers to POST responses |
|
Feb 28 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Nov 14 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Nov 14 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Oct 28 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Oct 26 |
answered | Reconciling Apache CPU usage in mod_status and top/mpstat |
|
Oct 25 |
asked | Reconciling Apache CPU usage in mod_status and top/mpstat |
|
Oct 23 |
revised |
Apache performance degrades dramatically above ~256 simultaneous requests Additional tests as suggested by commenters |
|
Oct 22 |
comment |
Apache performance degrades dramatically above ~256 simultaneous requests voretaq7: I was initially thinking along these same lines, since a typical request would also involve php/mysql, but the problem persists at the same threshold even when serving completely static content. |
|
Oct 22 |
comment |
Apache performance degrades dramatically above ~256 simultaneous requests ceejayoz: I appreciate the suggestions, but fundamentally I believe that Apache should not be this slow. There are a lot of things we can do to mitigate the effect of the problem, but I would much rather fix or at least understand it. |
|
Oct 22 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Oct 22 |
revised |
Apache performance degrades dramatically above ~256 simultaneous requests Added additional testing data in response to suggestion |
|
Oct 22 |
asked | Apache performance degrades dramatically above ~256 simultaneous requests |
|
Jun 14 |
accepted | Centralized virtualization (ESXi, XenServer) in a completely Windows-free environment |
|
Jun 13 |
comment |
Centralized virtualization (ESXi, XenServer) in a completely Windows-free environment This looks very promising. The odd thing is that the documented workflow for deploying the appliance (unless I'm reading it wrong) requires you to already have a working Windows client in place before you can deploy the server. So far this seems like the closest option, but it still seems like an imperfect solution. |
|
Jun 12 |
asked | Centralized virtualization (ESXi, XenServer) in a completely Windows-free environment |
|
May 26 |
awarded | Student |
|
May 26 |
awarded | Scholar |
