meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 4 years |
| seen | May 13 at 22:01 | |
| stats | profile views | 184 |
|
May 13 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
May 5 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jan 5 |
comment |
Are there any TLD registrars that support dnscurve? DJB has not released a new version of djbdns with DNSCurve support. 3rd parties have released patches for dnscache and a forwarder for tinydns. |
|
Jan 5 |
comment |
DNS server with easiest GUI I downvoted your answer because you're recommending software that: 1) needs patches for security vulnerabilities out of the box (which you're apparently not aware of, since you didn't mention them) 2) Does not support DNSSEC. |
|
Dec 27 |
revised |
How to use hdparm to fix a pending sector? expanded answer |
|
Dec 27 |
answered | How to use hdparm to fix a pending sector? |
|
Dec 26 |
comment |
Using .local for internal websites Any entity with sufficient cash can now purchase .1 - .9 from ICANN. |
|
Dec 26 |
comment |
Using .local for internal websites Everything to the right of the dot is now fair game: name.com/new-gtld |
|
Dec 25 |
comment |
DNS responses from ISP are slower and slower, solution? -1 for djbdns - it has security problems out of the box (Check the CVE database) and it doesn't do DNSSEC. |
|
Dec 25 |
comment |
DNS server with easiest GUI -1 for djbdns - It has security problems out of the box (Check the CVE database) and it doesn't do DNSSEC. |
|
Dec 25 |
comment |
How should one manager external and internal DNS servers at the same time? I no longer recommend djbdns. It doesn't do DNSSEC, and it has security problems out of the box (go check the CVE database). |
|
Dec 25 |
answered | in house DNS server |
|
Dec 25 |
comment |
in house DNS server No DNSSEC. The security is not as good as folks claim, either, go check the CVE entries. |
|
Dec 25 |
comment |
in house DNS server Nobody should be using djbdns nowadays. It doesn't do DNSSEC. Not to mention, it has three CVE listings against it, only one of which there is a really good easy fix for. |
|
Dec 25 |
revised |
Stop spoof emails in Google Apps correct brain fart |
|
Dec 25 |
comment |
Stop spoof emails in Google Apps I don't see how the domain in the forged envelope From being configured with a catch all speeds up a spam run. |
|
Dec 25 |
comment |
Stop spoof emails in Google Apps SPF isn't going to do anything in this case - ferris.edu is hosted with Google Apps and Google does not refuse mail based on SPF failures, even hardfail. Why Google is doing-accept-then-bounce on an unknown user instead of just rejecting with a 5XX is the real question here. |
|
Dec 25 |
answered | Stop spoof emails in Google Apps |
|
Dec 17 |
revised |
Alternative to Daemontools (djbtools) to supervise unix processes? expanded answer |
|
Dec 17 |
answered | Is there a way to tell SGE to run specific jobs as root on the execution node? |
