network profile
| bio | website | twitter.com/IanVaughan |
|---|---|---|
| location | Brighton, United Kingdom | |
| age | 37 | |
| visits | member for | 3 years, 7 months |
| seen | Mar 6 at 10:31 | |
| stats | profile views | 56 |
|
Feb 29 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Nov 25 |
awarded | Student |
|
Nov 25 |
revised |
Verify IMAP/POP3 connection to Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 clarify |
|
Nov 25 |
asked | Verify IMAP/POP3 connection to Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 |
|
Jul 12 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jul 12 |
accepted | key exchange on auto install to allow password-less auth (via SSH) |
|
Jul 11 |
comment |
key exchange on auto install to allow password-less auth (via SSH) Cool, I will give this ago sometime later today... |
|
Jul 11 |
asked | key exchange on auto install to allow password-less auth (via SSH) |
|
Jun 27 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Jun 27 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
|
Feb 9 |
comment |
Run a .bat file in a scheduled task without a window I like the idea, but I am the only user on this desktop, and its a work PC so cannot create others. When ever I select anything else in the "Run as" box, it asks for a password and confirmation, of which mine fails. |
|
Feb 9 |
comment |
Run a .bat file in a scheduled task without a window Both this and Rocketmonkeys suggestion involve downloading new tools, which means more compatibility over various peoples desktops. The baked in, using windows commands is much better. |
|
Feb 9 |
comment |
Run a .bat file in a scheduled task without a window This does not work, the Scheduled Task->Status states "Could not start", thats with : start /b C:\file.bat : and : start /b "C:\file.bat" : but : C:\file.bat : works just fine. |
|
Apr 29 |
revised |
iptables (NAT/PAT) setup for SSH & Samba Damn got A's & B's mixed up! |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
iptables (NAT/PAT) setup for SSH & Samba Thanks again, excellent idea, and your right, that would work! IF... I was allowed to change the main router. But I am within a company network, and thus cannot do that! (I have had them set routing for my subnet, 192.168.109.0/24 -> 172.24.150.50, but I was pushing my luck getting that!) Any anyway, I am actually after a different solution for transparency and portability. So again, many thanks... |
|
Apr 29 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Apr 29 |
revised |
iptables (NAT/PAT) setup for SSH & Samba Update after response from Eddie. |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
iptables (NAT/PAT) setup for SSH & Samba small note just for ref : "ssh -p $SOME_PORT" => "ssh <B_ip_addr> -p $SOME_PORT" |
|
Apr 29 |
comment |
iptables (NAT/PAT) setup for SSH & Samba That's a nice idea, but I have simplified the network diagram, there are many machines like A, and some have many hops, but they can all access B-eth0 ok. As you state, getting traffic for 192.168.0.0/24 to KNOW to goto 192.168.109.15 would be hard?! So this makes this solution not workable. Thanks. |
|
Apr 29 |
asked | iptables (NAT/PAT) setup for SSH & Samba |
