network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 3 years, 5 months |
| seen | Feb 27 at 4:57 | |
| stats | profile views | 12 |
|
Mar 5 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Nov 27 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Nov 16 |
accepted | Subversion 1.6 + SASL : Only works with plaintext 'userPassword'? |
|
Oct 19 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Aug 6 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Jan 27 |
revised |
rsync and bash command substitution edited body |
|
Jan 27 |
answered | rsync and bash command substitution |
|
Jan 26 |
comment |
Difference between default new file and new directory permissions @abc it really depends on what the programmer had in mind. Generally, for utilities that create files it is best to not have the execute bit set but require the user to add it explicitly. For utilities that create directories, the execute bit is generally set because that governs whether or not you can cd into it and/or list files within it; something that almost everybody wants by default. |
|
Jan 26 |
comment |
tar specific number of file @RobWouters doh, you're right! Ok, 3rd time's the charm |
|
Jan 26 |
revised |
tar specific number of file deleted 2 characters in body |
|
Jan 26 |
comment |
tar specific number of file @RobWouters Great idea. Did it in a slightly different way but this shouldn't cause any max arg errors. |
|
Jan 26 |
revised |
tar specific number of file added 30 characters in body |
|
Jan 26 |
revised |
tar specific number of file added 355 characters in body |
|
Jan 26 |
answered | tar specific number of file |
|
Jan 26 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Jan 26 |
answered | Difference between default new file and new directory permissions |
|
Nov 9 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Sep 20 |
accepted | “Transparent” SATA RAID Controllers |
|
Sep 20 |
revised |
“Transparent” SATA RAID Controllers edited title |
|
Sep 20 |
comment |
“Transparent” SATA RAID Controllers Thank you for the response. Follow up question: would these non-fakeraid controllers still require explicit driver support for common imaging software products such as Norton or Acronis? Ideally, I would like to boot off one of the aforementioned utilities' boot CD and not have to worry about drivers for it to see the RAID volume. |
