| bio | website | paulkroon.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | Glenside, PA | |
| age | 27 | |
| visits | member for | 3 years, 3 months |
| seen | 8 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 96 |
I'm a sysadmin for a Windows environment (MCSE: Security) with a few Linux boxes as well, which includes handling the whole list of things that come up in an office. If it uses electricity, I pretty much support it. My areas of "expertise" would be VMWare Infrastructure, Exchange 2010, SQL Server 2005/2008, PHP programming, and scripting of all kinds (VBS, Bash, Perl).
|
May 21 |
answered | Single haproxy fronted for different services |
|
Apr 25 |
answered | Ignore port numbers in haproxy host header matches |
|
Mar 1 |
answered | HA proxy and keepalived with Splunk search heads |
|
Feb 22 |
comment |
HAProxy check port 443 I haven't been able to find it mentioned in the docs, but there were a few forum posts where the HAProxy creator mentioned it (for example, serverphorums.com/read.php?10,38918). There was a more recent one as well, but I can't find it again now. The port 80 check may work because it ignores the ssl-hello-chk, but I'm not sure. Does it pass the check if you remove one of the two options? |
|
Feb 22 |
answered | HAProxy check port 443 |
|
Feb 11 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Feb 7 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Feb 7 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Jan 25 |
comment |
Site to site VPN between Cisco VPN Router and Sonicwall NAT issues I believe your problem is because both sides are in the same 10.0.0.0/24 subnet. The devices wouldn't know to route to the other side. Is it possible to renumber the IPs on one side? If not, could you use multiple /30 IP subnets just for the devices as the local and remote subnets, and then have static routes to get to the other side via the /30s? |
|
Jan 25 |
comment |
Haproxy SSL offloading No problem, I'm glad it was an easy one. I added my comment as an answer if you want to mark it to close this out. |
|
Jan 25 |
answered | Haproxy SSL offloading |
|
Jan 24 |
comment |
Haproxy SSL offloading Is it possible these requests you see are just multiple HTTP requests to load the page? I believe the roundrobin balance will have each separate request go to a different backend server. If you wanted a user to only interact with a single backend server at a time, I think you'd need to look into persistence. As another possibility, could you be seeing the backend server checks in the logs? |
|
Jan 22 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Dec 9 |
comment |
Haproxy Server Statistics page reads server DOWN You should post up your HAProxy config then. You probably just need to remove the server from the config. |
|
Dec 5 |
comment |
Haproxy Server Statistics page reads server DOWN Is this a server that is actually down, and you want to remove it from the HAProxy config file, or is this a server that is functioning correctly, but HAProxy believes is down? |
|
Sep 24 |
comment |
Routing between subnets on different vlans connected by a router/firewall What else do you have configured on the Vyatta so far? Also, can you post example net settings for a sample host on both sides (ip addr, netmask, gateway)? |
|
Aug 23 |
answered | Cisco port down and notconnect after changing port speed |
|
Jul 12 |
answered | Event ID 4013: “The DNS server is waiting for Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) to signal…" |
|
Jun 29 |
comment |
How to interconnect 2 switches (Cisco/Dell) with trunks @Disco - Yes, you can configure both of those links the same way, and then you'll get some redundancy, too. However, it's very important that spanning-tree (STP) be running on those switches (should be by default), otherwise you would create a loop. Some form of show spanning-tree on each switch will probably give you more details. |
|
Jun 29 |
comment |
How to interconnect 2 switches (Cisco/Dell) with trunks @Disco - You need switchport trunk native vlan 10 on the port. By default, the native VLAN is 1 on the Cisco switch. Otherwise, you would want to specify the native VLAN as 1 on the Dell as well for that to work as is (10 and 20 would then be allowed). The important piece of info to know is that when you set up a trunk link, it runs several VLANs over that same link between the switches. |