Reputation
Next privilege 200 Rep.
See reduced ads
Badges
7
Newest
 Supporter
Impact
~4k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 1 vote cast
Jan
26
comment Automation and full-disk encryption
It isnt useless. If you read the Original question, its about secure wipe. During normal usage, theres no need to protect the data, thus the encryption can have a auto random password. But when its time to decommission the server, you dont need to securely wipe the whole drive. You just need to wipe the sector(s) where the key is stored, preferable with gutmann 35. Then the rest of disk can be erased with dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/(diskname) bs=1024 . If someone recovers one of the zeroed sectors, it wont matter since they are encrypted with a key that has been gutmann 35:ed.
Jan
16
answered Automation and full-disk encryption
May
6
awarded  Supporter
May
6
accepted Have postfix to reply with 2 different hostnames?
May
6
comment Have postfix to reply with 2 different hostnames?
however, the SMTP box is behind a multiWAN firewall, so the SMTP box itself does not know which IP the request received on. Thats why I need a different port, so I can NAT all requests arriving at 193. to port 25 on 192.168.1.x and NAT all requests arriving at 95. to port 26 on 192.168.1.x.
May
4
asked Have postfix to reply with 2 different hostnames?
Jun
28
accepted Spoof IPP response in firewall?
Jun
26
answered Spoof IPP response in firewall?
Jun
26
comment Spoof IPP response in firewall?
The idea is that I have a printer which is only able to do auth by username/password, but what I want is auth by single sign on. Since the firewall does the auth task, the firewall does have the record of which IPs are logged in the network and can then permit the IPs who are logged in, to print. But I finally found a protocol example and solved the question.
Jun
26
asked Spoof IPP response in firewall?
Feb
24
awarded  Tumbleweed
Feb
17
answered What is the benefit of using DKIM to sign Content Type?
Jan
25
awarded  Popular Question
Mar
28
accepted Getting bind9 to answer on a Dual NIC machine?
Mar
28
comment Getting bind9 to answer on a Dual NIC machine?
Thanks, solved the problem perfectly. Now I have 2 "Virtual" DNS servers on the same physical machine and my registrar are happy now. Now my domain is alive :-)
Mar
28
comment Getting bind9 to answer on a Dual NIC machine?
Done. Added the tcpdump outputs to the main post. However "port dns" did not work, had to do "port 53".
Mar
28
revised Getting bind9 to answer on a Dual NIC machine?
added 9333 characters in body
Mar
28
awarded  Scholar
Mar
28
accepted Problems forwarding zone to another DNS server
Mar
28
asked Getting bind9 to answer on a Dual NIC machine?