meta user
network profile
| bio | website | mindbent.org |
|---|---|---|
| location | Austin, TX | |
| age | 36 | |
| visits | member for | 4 years |
| seen | May 27 at 19:23 | |
| stats | profile views | 98 |
Senior Linux Administrator, recovering software developer
|
May 29 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
May 1 |
answered | Postfix configuration [Fail to receive incoming emails from internet] |
|
Apr 22 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Feb 27 |
answered | High Load Average with modest CPU Utilization and almost no IO |
|
Feb 27 |
answered | MySQL Partition / Very High Volume of Records |
|
Nov 9 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Jun 8 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
May 29 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Apr 17 |
comment |
Network performance deteriorates when uninvolved device on switch is shut down All I can think of is a bad switch. You seem to be using an off-brand model, and they often do weird things. I would try a known good switch, or experiment with different cables in different ports. You might also do a wireshark or tcpdump on the nettop looking for anything interesting. |
|
Dec 29 |
comment |
iptables - Target to route packet to specific interface? To eliminate options you might try doing a packet capture on tun0, and see if packets are ending up on that interface. tcpdump -i tun0.. alternatively, do you need to base it on user ID? Could you just do it based on the destination IP address (easier)? route add <remote host> via 10.32.0.49 |
|
Dec 29 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Dec 29 |
revised |
iptables - Target to route packet to specific interface? Forgot via between default and the IP of the remote side of the tunnel |
|
Dec 29 |
comment |
iptables - Target to route packet to specific interface? Sorry forgot the via between default and the IP. |
|
Dec 29 |
answered | iptables - Target to route packet to specific interface? |
|
Nov 14 |
answered | 'inode table usage' spiking every morning at 8am |
|
Sep 23 |
comment |
50,000 file in one directory, what is my best option? Mentioning that it was on Xen would have been helpful. You might try setting the disk elevator queue to noop. Add elevator=noop to your kernel parameters. |
|
Sep 21 |
comment |
50,000 file in one directory, what is my best option? I still think you have some other issue. I created 50,000 1k files in ext3 loopback filesystem and "ls >> /dev/null" takes .2seconds. |
|
Sep 21 |
answered | 50,000 file in one directory, what is my best option? |
|
Jul 1 |
answered | Gmail flagging emails as spam despite SPF being enabled and working perfectly |
|
Jun 13 |
answered | Very simple incomng mail server |
