Reputation
645
Next privilege 1,000 Rep.
See votes, expandable usercard
Badges
4 19
Impact
~51k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 2 helpful flags
  • 85 votes cast
Nov
8
revised Exchange "Send-As” results in “You do not have permission to send to this recipient”
added 5 characters in body
Nov
8
comment HOw to make two computers with different internet access each others network share
The easiest method is to create a vpn connecting the two sites, imo.
Nov
8
answered Exchange "Send-As” results in “You do not have permission to send to this recipient”
Nov
8
answered HOw to make two computers with different internet access each others network share
Nov
8
awarded  Commentator
Nov
8
comment SNTP, why do you mock me?
Just out of interest, what settings do you apply to workstation pcs?
Nov
8
comment SNTP, why do you mock me?
I'll go back and try this.
Nov
8
revised SNTP, why do you mock me?
edited body
Nov
8
revised SNTP, why do you mock me?
added 325 characters in body
Nov
8
revised SNTP, why do you mock me?
added 14 characters in body
Nov
8
comment SNTP, why do you mock me?
I used 'w32tm /resync'
Nov
8
revised SNTP, why do you mock me?
added 4 characters in body
Nov
8
revised SNTP, why do you mock me?
deleted 2 characters in body
Nov
8
revised SNTP, why do you mock me?
added 1748 characters in body; added 27 characters in body
Nov
8
awarded  Supporter
Nov
8
comment SNTP, why do you mock me?
I have updated the question with what I have found. Any suggestions?
Nov
8
revised SNTP, why do you mock me?
added 1597 characters in body
Nov
8
comment SNTP, why do you mock me?
I guess I will have to have a look at the packet-cap.
Nov
8
comment SNTP, why do you mock me?
I still wonder about microsoft's ntp implementation. My cisco devices aren't able to use the ntp server on w2k3 but they use a ntpd on linux just fine. (it may just be down to my screwed up config)
Nov
8
comment SNTP, why do you mock me?
@btw. Good to know, but i thought i would try TIMESOURCE value just in case. I can remmove it, but it didn't work just the same without it beforehand :L