network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 6 months |
| seen | 2 days ago | |
| stats | profile views | 2 |
|
Mar 3 |
awarded | Tumbleweed |
|
Feb 24 |
asked | In postfix how can I conditionally enforce check_sender_access |
|
Feb 24 |
asked | In postfix, how to implement access rules with an sql query |
|
Feb 22 |
accepted | In postfix, how to enforce tls + auth over 587 while leaving tls optional for 25 |
|
Feb 22 |
comment |
In postfix, how to enforce tls + auth over 587 while leaving tls optional for 25 Correct but I want to enable optional auth+tls on 25. I just dont want to relay on 25. Essentially I want to be liberal about how someone connects but very strict on relaying(deny all relaying). No Relaying should be permitted unless it comes on 587 and client is authed via tls. Any other combination should reject relaying. I ll probably just remove permit_sasl_authenticated from smtpd_relay_restrictions and put it only in overrides for 587 in master.cf. Thanks. |
|
Feb 22 |
comment |
In postfix, how to enforce tls + auth over 587 while leaving tls optional for 25 Thanks, only one blurry point: On port 25 I want to unconditionally deny relaying, no matter if client authenticated or not. |
|
Feb 22 |
asked | In postfix, how to enforce tls + auth over 587 while leaving tls optional for 25 |
|
Dec 29 |
suggested | suggested edit on which disto to pick for Linode? |
|
Dec 27 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Dec 27 |
accepted | When registering a domain, is it possible to designate primary and secondary nameservers by FQDN and IP? |
|
Dec 27 |
comment |
When registering a domain, is it possible to designate primary and secondary nameservers by FQDN and IP? Perfect, thanks. Can you please tell me if this practice is good/bad/doesnt-matter/common/rare? I am asking because it was difficult to find info about it(until now). |
|
Dec 27 |
awarded | Student |
|
Dec 27 |
asked | When registering a domain, is it possible to designate primary and secondary nameservers by FQDN and IP? |
|
Nov 19 |
awarded | Supporter |
